SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 56

ANIL R.DAVE, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Usha Rectifier Corpn. (I) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —

1. By this judgment and order we propose to dispose of the appeal which is filed by the appellant herein being aggrieved by the judgments and orders passed by the authorities including the Customs, Excise & Gold [Control] Appellate Tribunal [for short ‘CEGAT’] demanding duty of Rs. 4,92,566.28 from the appellant on the plant and machinery including testing equipments manufactured by them.

2. The appellant herein is a manufacturer of electronic transformers, semi-conductor devices and other electrical and electronics equipments. During the course of such manufacture the appellant also manufactured machinery in the nature of testing equipments to test the final products of the assessee company costing Rs. 31,27,405/- as per Note 6 of the Schedule ‘Q’ page 15 of the balance sheet for the year ending December, 1987. The aforesaid position was further reiterated in the Director’s report appearing at page no. 2 of the Annual Report for the year ending December, 1988.

3. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant directing them to show cause as to why central excise duty should not be levied on it along with interest and penalty. The appellant sub















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top