ANIL R.DAVE, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Usha Rectifier Corpn. (I) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —
1. By this judgment and order we propose to dispose of the appeal which is filed by the appellant herein being aggrieved by the judgments and orders passed by the authorities including the Customs, Excise & Gold [Control] Appellate Tribunal [for short ‘CEGAT’] demanding duty of Rs. 4,92,566.28 from the appellant on the plant and machinery including testing equipments manufactured by them.
2. The appellant herein is a manufacturer of electronic transformers, semi-conductor devices and other electrical and electronics equipments. During the course of such manufacture the appellant also manufactured machinery in the nature of testing equipments to test the final products of the assessee company costing Rs. 31,27,405/- as per Note 6 of the Schedule ‘Q’ page 15 of the balance sheet for the year ending December, 1987. The aforesaid position was further reiterated in the Director’s report appearing at page no. 2 of the Annual Report for the year ending December, 1988.
3. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant directing them to show cause as to why central excise duty should not be levied on it along with interest and penalty. The appellant sub
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.