SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 135

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Jagga Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 04.12.2006.

3. The facts have been set out in the impugned judgment and hence we are not repeating the same here except where necessary.

4. In brief, the prosecution case is that on 24.4.92 at about 8.30 p.m., the 3 accused came to the house of Raja Singh. Later, one of them fired at Baggar Singh on his right thigh. Baggar Singh fell down. Then the accused took away the deceased Hoshiar Singh towards village Heerawala. After about 20 minutes the sound of 3 or 4 shots was heard. Next morning the dead body of Hoshiar Singh was found.

5. The trial Court convicted Jagga Singh to 7 years R.I. and a fine under Section 307 IPC. Jagtar Singh and Kaka Singh were also sentenced to 7 years R.I. and a fine. The appeals of the accused to the High Court were dismissed, but the appeal of the State regarding acquittal of the accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 was allowed, and they were convicted under Section 302. Hence, this appeal.

6. On the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that the appellants are entitled to get the benefit of




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top