SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 176

2011 (2) Supreme 66
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Misra, JJ.
Neha Arun Jugadar & Anr. — Petitioner(s)
versus
Kumari Palak Diwan Ji — Respondent(s)
Transfer Petition (Civil.) No(s). 182 of 2011
Decided on : 14-2-2011

IMPORTANT POINT
Ingredients for transfer of case stated.

Headnote:(a) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 25 – Provision can be invoked where both the courts, namely, the transferor court as well as the transferee court, have jurisdiction to hear the case and the party seeking transfer of the case alleges that the transferee court would be more convenient or for some other reason – There is no question of transfer of a case which has been filed in a court which has no jurisdiction at all to hear it. (Para 3)

        (b) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 21 – When a party has objection to the jurisdiction of a court, he should apply to that court for dismissing it on this ground – There is no question of transfer of such a case. (Para 4)

       Facts of the case:

        This is a transfer petition on the ground of jurisdiction.

       

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. This Transfer Petition has been filed to transfer case being MACT No. 138 of 2009 pending at the District Judge (MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) to the competent Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The petitioners allege in the petition that the MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. has no jurisdiction in the matter.

3. An order of transfer of a case can be passed where both the courts, namely, the transferor court as well as the transferee court, have jurisdiction to hear the case and the party seeking transfer of the case alleges that the transferee court would be more convenient because the witnesses are available there or for some other reason it will be convenient for the parties to have the case heard by the transferee court. There is no question of transfer of a case which has been filed in a court which has no jurisdiction at all to hear it.

4. In a case where a party alleges that the court where the case is pending has no jurisdiction, he should apply to that court for dismissing it on this ground. There is no question of transfer of such a case.

5. Hence, the petitioners herein may apply to the District Judge (MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) for dismissal of the case pending before it on the ground that there is no jurisdiction in the Court to hear the case, and if they do so, the Court concerned will decide the application as a preliminary ground before proceeding to hear the case on merits.

6. With these observations, the transfer petition is dismissed.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top