SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 213

2011 (2) Supreme 173
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Markandey Katju and Gyan Shdha Misra, JJ.
Baldev Singh & Ors. — Appellant(s)
versus
State of Punjab — Respondent(s)
Criminal Appeal No. 749 of 2007
Decided on : 22-2-2011

Headnote:Indian Penal Code,1860-Sections 376 (2) (g), 342 -Conviction of appellants for committing rape on prosecuterix and beating her-Appellants sentenced to 10 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. - The sentence was upheld by High Court- Appeal- Considering that the incident happened in the year 1997 and that parties had themselves entered into a compromise, conviction of the appellant upheld sentence reduced to the period already undergone in view of the proviso to Section 376 (2) (g) which for adequate and special reasons permits imposition of a lesser sentence- However, direction given that each of appellant would pay a sum of Rupees 50,000/- by way of enhancement of fine to the victim envisaged under Section 376 of IPC itself (Paras 5 to 7)

       Facts of the Case :

        Appellants three in numbere were convicted herein in the instant case for committing rape on prosecuterix and beating her.Appellants were sentenced to 10 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. . The sentence was upheld by High Court.

        2. Present appeal has been filed against said order of High Court.

       Findings of the Court :

        Considering that the incident happened in the year 1997 and that parties had themselves entered into a compromise, conviction of the appellant was upheld but sentence was reduced to the period already undergone in view of the proviso to Section 376 (2) (g) which for adequate and special reasons permits imposition of a lesser sentence. However direction was given that each of appellant would pay a sum of Rupees 50,000/- by way of enhancement of fine to the victim envisaged under Section 376 of IPC itself.

       

ORDER

1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 27.0.2005 IN CRLA No. 242 of 1999 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.

2. The facts of the case have been set out in the judgment of the High Court and hence we are not repeating the same here, except where necessary.

3. The prosecution case is that on 03.03.1997 at about 6.30 A.M. the prosecutrix was coming to her house after answering the call of nature. The three appellants caught her and took her into a house and raped her and beat her. After police investigation the appellants were charge sheeted, and after a trial were convicted under Section 376 (2) (g) and Section 342 I.P.C. and sentenced to 10 years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. The sentence was upheld by the High Court, and hence this appeal.

4. Admittedly the appellants have already undergone, about 3 and = years imprisonment each. The incident is 14 years old. The appellants and the prosecutrix are married (not to each other). The prosecutrix has also two children. An application and affidavit has been filed before us stating that the parties want to finish the dispute, have entered into a compromise on 01.09.2007, and that the accused may be acquitted and now there is no misunderstanding between them.

5. Section 376 is a non compoundable offence, However, the fact that the incident is an old one, is a circumstance for invoking the proviso to Section 376 (2) (g) and awarding a sentence less than 10 years, which is ordinarily the minimum sentence under that provision, as we think that there are adequate and special reasons for doing so.

6. On the facts of the case, considering that the incident happened in the year 1997 and that the parties have themselves entered into a compromise, we uphold the conviction of the appellant but we reduce the sentence to the period of sentence already undergone in view of the proviso to Section 376 (2) (g) which for adequate and special reasons permits imposition of a lesser sentence. However, we direct that each of the appellant will pay a sum of Rupees 50,000/- by way of enhancement of fine to the victim envisaged under Section 376 of the IPC itself. The fine shall be paid within three months from today. In the event of failure to pay the enhanced amount of fine it will be recovered as arrears of land revenue and will be given to the victim.

7. The appeal is disposed off.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top