SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 235

H.L.DATTU, D.K.JAIN
Ranu Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.K. Jain, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2. This batch of appeals, by grant of leave, arises out of judgments and or- ders dated 9th April 2009, 22nd June 2009, 17th July 2009 and 18th Septem- ber 2009 respectively passed by the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati. By the impugned judgments, the High Court has held that the Assam Ele- mentary Education (Provincialization) (Amendment) Rules, 2005 (for short “the Amendment Rules, 2005”) are ultra vires the provisions of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (for short “the Act”) and the Regulations framed thereunder.

3. The material facts leading up to the filing of the writ petitions before the High Court may be stated as follows :

The National Council for Teacher Education (for short “the NCTE”) was set up in the year 1973 by a Government Resolution as a National Ex-pert Body to advise the Central and State Governments on all matters per-taining to teacher education. Since the role assigned to the NCTE was purely advisory in nature, it had very little impact on the standards of teacher train-ing institutions in the country and on their unplanned growth. Therefore, in order to empower the NCTE to make qualitative improve






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top