SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 686

P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN
Jagtu – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Mal – Respondent


Judgment :

1. Heard Sh. Mahabir Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Sh. B.S. Gupta, counsel for the respondents.

2. Application for impleadment is allowed.

3. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 22nd October, 2002 passed in Regular Second Appeal No. 4141 of 2002, which affirmed the Judgment and Order of the First Appellate Court dated 30th September, 2002 passed in Civil Appeal No. 109 of 2001 reversing the Judgment and Decree passed by the Civil Court dated 23rd November, 2001 in Civil Suit No. 423 RT of 1998/2000.

4. Admittedly, the respondents/plaintiffs had filed the suit seeking declaration of certain rights over the suit land admitting the factual position that the land belonged to the State of Haryana. The respondents/plaintiffs as well as the appellants/defendants were tenants in the said suit land. Before the Trial Court, the appellants/defendants had raised the preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the suit for non-joinder of parties. They had taken a stand that the suit for declaration of certain rights in the land belonging to the State of Haryana was not maintainable wit




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top