SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 361

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Rukia Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Key Points: - Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt and be incapable of any other explanation. (!) - When reviewing acquittals, High Court may appraise evidence but must give weight to trial court’s view and presumption of innocence; not to substitute lightly. (!) - Convictions based on circumstantial evidence require that the circumstances conclusively point to the accused’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt; motive alone without corroborating evidence is insufficient for A1 and A2. (!) (!)

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


JUDGMENT

Chandramauli KR. Prasad, J. —

1. Altogether 8 persons were put on trial for commission of the offence under Section 302 and 201 read with Section 34 as also Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Accused Jaibunissa died during the trial, whereas accused Rukiya Begum, Nasreen, Mansoor and Mohmmed Ghouse were acquitted of all the charges. However accused Issaq Sait, Nasarath and Mujahid were held guilty of the offence under Section 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded life imprisonment and seven years imprisonment respectively. State of Karnataka, aggrieved by the acquittal of Rukia Begum Nasreen, Mansoor and Mohammed Ghouse preferred appeal whereas appellant Issaq Sait and Mujahid aggrieved by their conviction and sentence also preferred appeal. State also preferred appeal seeking enhancement of sentence. All the appeals were heard together and the High Court by its common judgment dated 28th of May, 2007 dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants Issaq Sait and Mujahid. The appeal filed by the State against the acquittal of the accused persons was partly allowed by the High Court and it set aside the acquittal of Rukia Begum, Nasreen a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top