SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 356

2011 (3) Supreme 74
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Altamas Kabir and Cyriac Joseph, JJ.
Glodyne Technoserve Ltd. — Appellant
versus
State of M.P. & Ors. — Respondents
Civil Appeal No.2907 of 2011
(Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.21899 of 2010)
Decided on : 4-4-2011

IMPORTANT POINT
Discretion exercised by the authorities, if not perverse, cannot be interfered with.

Headnote:(a) Government Contract – The RFP obliging a tenderer to produce along with the bid document a copy of the Quality certificate valid and active on the date of submission of the bid – Appellant although claiming to have a valid and active ISO 9001:2000 certificate at the relevant time, not submitting copy thereof – Appellant liable to be disqualified. (Para 32)

        (2008) 16 SCC 215; (1990) 2 SCC 486; (2009) 11 SCC 9 – Relied upon impliedly

        (1994) 6 SCC 651; (1995) 1 SCC 478; (2007) 8 SCC 1 – Distinguished impliedly

        (b) Judicial Review – Accepting or rejecting the explanation regarding not submitting the required certificate along with the Bid despite having it is in the discretionary domain of the authorities – Exercise of that discretion cannot be said to be perverse. (Para 33)

       Facts of the case:

        1. The RFP issued by Government of M.P. required ISO 9001:2000 to be submitted with the bid.

        2. The appellant had a valid certification, but inadvertently or otherwise submitted the said certificate for the previous year.

        3. The question for decision in this case is whether the appellant was disqualified from consideration.

       Finding of the Court:

        Discretion exercised by the authorities, if not perverse, cannot be interfered with.

       Result : Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Altamas Kabir, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2. The Appellant is a Public Limited Company which claims to have an annual turnover of almost Rs.750 crores and has been carrying out large scale infrastructure projects for various State Governments in India, including Maharashtra and Bihar, where bio-metrics of millions of people are required to be collected to ensure identification of the population which is targeted as beneficiaries of various Government Welfare Schemes, such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. The Appellant Company has been holding ISO 9001:2000 Certificate for the highest quality standards in respect of the services rendered by it. The Appellant Company claims to have carried out a pilot project in respect of 10 shops in the State Government Public Distribution System in Bhopal.

3. On 12th December, 2009, the Government of Madhya Pradesh in the Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, hereinafter referred to as “FCS”, issued a Request for Proposal, hereinafter referred to as “RFP”, for the appointment of a vendor for District Mechanism for Public Distribution System, hereinafter referred to as “PDS”. The last date for submission of bids was 7th January, 2010, which was subsequently extended till 17th February, 2010.

4. The RFP, as it stood at the time when the bids were invited, included Section 3.1 which, inter alia, provides that the bidder/one partner in the consortium must possess a valid certification in the Capability Maturity Model (CMM level 3 or above). In addition, the bidder/all partners of consortium (in case of consortium) should have an active (valid at least till June, 2010) ISO 9001:2000 certificate which had to be submitted as qualifying documents.

5. Subsequently, on 18th January, 2010, the pre-qualification (Eligibility Criteria) provided in the RFP was changed and the corrigendum, as far as it relates to Section 3.1, was amended so that the bidder/one partner in the consortium had to possess a valid certification in the Capability Maturity Model (CMM level 3 or above). In case of consortium, the partner developing the software application should have CMM level 3 certification and the bidder/lead partners of the consortium (in case of consortium, should have an active (valid at least till June, 2010) ISO 9001:2000 certification at the time of submission of the bid. The documents to be submitted along with the bid remained the same. Vide the corrigendum dated 18th January, 2010, Section 7 which provided for the Bidder Check List, was also altered. Prior to its amendment, Section 7.1.1 provided that the Company/one partner in the consortium (in case of consortium) should have an active ISO 9001:2000 certification at the time of submission of the bid, and it was also provided that a copy of the Quality Certificate or documentation of the quality policy were required to be provided along with the bid document. It was also submitted that in case the certificate was issued for renewal, the bidder should ensure that the renewed certificate was made available at the time of signing of the contract. It was mentioned that in case the same was not provided, the Department may consider initiating the Award of the contract with the second lowest bidder. The criteria relating to the documents to be submitted as qualifying documents included a copy of the quality certificate/documentation of quality policy. The corrigendum dated 18th January, 2010, amended the said provision to indicate that the bidder/one partner in the consortium must possess a valid certification in the Capability Maturity Model (CMM level 3 or above), in case of consortium the partner developing the software application was required to have CMM level 3 certification. It was further stated that the bidder/lead partners of the consortium (in case of consortium) should have an active (valid at least till June, 2010) ISO 9001:2000 certification at the time of the submission of the bid. The documents to





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top