ANIL R.DAVE, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
State of J & K – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Dogra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —
1. Since, all these appeals involve identical issues both on facts and law, therefore, we have heard all these appeals in one bunch. We also propose to dispose of all these petitions by this common judgment and order, as the issues urged before us are identical.
2. Delay condoned.
3. Leave granted.
4. The appellants herein issued an advertisement inviting applications for making direct recruitment to the post of Prosecuting Officers in Jammu & Kashmir Police, in the State of Jammu & Kashmir. There are altogether two such advertisement/notices, the one issued on 24.3.2000 and the other dated 5.3.2003. In the aforesaid advertisment/notices, various criterion were laid down as essential suitability conditions. One such condition was with regard to age/physical qualifications to be possessed by the applicants. In the said advertisement, it was clearly mentioned that applications of only such candidates would be considered for selection who conform to the following physical standard fixed by the Government:-
“(i) Height - `5-6”
(ii) Chest
Unexpanded 32 =”,
Expanded 33 =”
5. In the said advertisement/notices, it was specifically indicated that Rule 17
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.