2011 (3) Supreme 283
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Misra, JJ.
Bhanu Valve — Petitioner(s)
versus
State — Respondent(s)
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3192 of 2011
(Crl MP.No(s). 7901/2011)
Decided on : 18-4-2011
Facts of the case:
1. The petitioner has been found guilty of raping his own daughter regularly for five years after his wife left him, and has produced a child from her.
2. Conviction by Trial Court was upheld by High Court.
Finding of the Court:
There is no reason to hold contrary to the concurrent finding of guilt by the courts below.
Result : SLP dismissed.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Delay condoned.
3. This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Bomaby High Court dated 27.07.2010 by which the High Court has upheld the conviction of the petitioner by the trial court.
4. The facts in detail have been set out in the impugned judgment, and hence we are not repeating the same here. The High Court and the trial court have discussed the evidence in great detail, and we entirely agree with the view they have taken.
5. This is one of the most barbaric and heinous cases we have come across in our judicial career. The petitioner has been found guilty of raping his own daughter regularly for five years after his wife left him, and has produced a child from her. This kind of unheard behaviour cannot be condoned by any means. The daughter-PW-1 (prosecutrix) has given her evidence in this case, and we see no reason to disbelieve her.
6. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.
***********
2011 (3) Supreme 284
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. Sathasivam and Dr. B.S. Chauhan, JJ.
Kulvinder Singh & Anr. — Appellants
versus
State of Haryana — Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 916 of 2005
Decided on : 11-4-2011
Indian Penal Code, 1860- Section 302 - Prosecution of appellant accused persons two in number for causing death of deceased by assaulting him with sharp edged weapon-Conviction by Trial Court-Appeal- Dismissed by High Court-Appeal-Evidence on record that A1 had been harbouring in his mind the suspicion that deceased was teasing his sister and wife-Deposition of PW10 that accused had disclosed to him that they had committed the murder of deceased- Nothing on record to indicate that he had any motive to falsely implicate the accused or that there was any motive for attributing an untruthful statement to accused-No reason not to accept his deposition in respect of extra-judicial confession made by the appellants as his deposition stood the test of credibility- Instantly motive stood proved distinctly, recovery of a blood stained barchha from sugarcane field at the disclosure of A1 was a circumstance which could safely be relied upon for conviction of appellants-accused- As both the appellants had been seen immediately before the occurrence at the place of occurrence and the deceased had come there shortly thereafter, they had an opportunity to kill deceased- After the occurrence, they were seen running together from the place of occurrence by PW.3- Such a conduct, if examined, with extra-judicial confession made by appellants before PW.10 completed the chain of circumstances pointing to the guilt of appellants-accused-Appeal dismissed. (Paras 6 to 15, 22)
Facts of the Case :
Appellant accused persons two in number were prosecuted herein in the instant case for causing death of deceased by assaulting him with sharp edged weopan. Trial Court convicted accused persons for said offence .Appeal thereagainst was Dismissed by High Court.
2. Present appeal has been filed against said order of High Court.
Findings of the Court :
Evidence on record that A1 had been harbouring in his mind the suspicion that deceased was teasing his sister and wife. Deposition of PW10 that accused had disclosed to him that they had committed the murder of deceased. There was Nothing on record to indicate that he had any motive to falsely implicate the accused or that there was any motive for attributing an untruthful statement to accused. No reason not to accept his deposition in respect of extra-judicial confession made by the appellants as his deposition stood the test of credibility. Instantly motive stood proved distinctly, recovery of a blood stained barchha from sugarcane field at the disclosure of A1 was a circumstance which could safely be relied upon for conviction of appellants-accused. As both the appellants had been seen immediately before the occurrence at the place of occurrence and the deceased had come there shortly thereafter, they had an opportunity to kill deceas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.