SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 531

2011 (4) Supreme 221
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Altamas Kabir and Cyriac Joseph, JJ.
D. Sudhakar & Ors. — Appellants
versus
D.N. Jeevaraju & Ors. — Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos.4510-4514 of 2011
(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.5966-5970 of 2011)
with
C.A.Nos.4517-4521 of 2011
(@ SLP(C)Nos.5995-5999 of 2011)
Decided on : 13-5-2011

Headnote:Judicial Review – An independent legislator does not always have to express his intention to join a party in writing – Yet, mere extension of support to the Chief Minister and the decision to join his Cabinet was not sufficient to indicate that the appellants had decided to join and/or had actually joined the concerned Party. (Para 2)

       Facts of the case:

        The question arising herein is whether mere extending support to a Chief Minister amounts to an independent MLA joining the Chief Minister’s party.

       Finding of the Court:

        The question raised is answered in the negative.

       Result : Appeal allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

Altamas Kabir, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2. We are unable to accept the submission made on behalf of the respondents that by extending support to Shri Yeddyurappa in the formation of the Bharatiya Janata Party led Government the appellants had sacrificed their independent identity. The fact that the said appellants also joined the Council of Ministers does not also point to such an eventuality. It is no doubt true that an independent legislator does not always have to express his intention to join a party in writing, but the mere extension of support to Shri Yeddyurappa and the decision to join his Cabinet, in our view, was not sufficient to indicate that the appellants had decided to join and/or had actually joined the Bharatiya Janata Party, particularly on account of the subsequent conduct in which they were treated differently from the Members of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

3. We are, therefore, unable to sustain the decision of the Speaker as affirmed by the High Court and we, accordingly, allow the appeals and set aside the orders passed by the Speaker on 11.10.2010 and by the Full Bench of the High Court on 14.2.2011.

4. There will, however, be no order as to costs.

5. Detailed judgment will follow.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top