Back
2011 (4) Supreme 625
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, JJ.
Ramrameshwari Devi and Ors. — Appellants
versus
Nirmala Devi and Ors. — Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 4912-4913 of 2011
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 3157-3158 of 2011)
Decided on : 4-7-2011
(b) Administration of Justice – Practice and procedure – Some cantankerous and unscrupulous litigants on one ground or the other do not permit the courts to proceed further in the matter – Such practice deprecated – Need for remedial steps emphasised. (Paras 30 and 31)
(c) Administration of Justice – Uncalled for litigation – The parties raise unwarranted claims and defences and also adopt obstructionist and delaying – Ordinarily, the successful party usually remains uncompensated – Need for restitution and imposing actual or realistic costs couples with prosecution emphasized as remedial measure. (Para 34)
(d) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XXXIX Rule 2A – While granting ad interim ex-parte injunction or stay order the court must record undertaking from the plaintiff or the petitioner that he will have to pay mesne profits at the market rate and costs in the event of dismissal of interim application and the suit. (Para 41)
(e) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XIV Rule 1 – When a point has been determined up to the Supreme Court, the trial court ought not to have framed issue on that point – Even otherwise framing of such issue is exclusively barred by res judicata. (Para 44)
(f) Code of Civil Procedure – Order XXXIX Rule 2A – Ad interim injunction – As a rule, the court should grant interim injunction or stay order only after hearing the defendants or the respondents – Ex-parte injunction may be granted in exceptional cases and while granting injunction the court must record in the order that if the suit is eventually dismissed, the plaintiff or the petitioner will have to pay full restitution, actual or realistic costs and mesne profits – Additionally, the life of ex parte ad interim injunction may be made extremely short. (Paras 47 and 48)
(g) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 195 – To achieve clandestine objects, false pleas are taken and forged documents are filed indiscriminately because the parties have hardly any apprehension of being prosecuted for perjury or even pay heavy costs – Perjury has become a way of life in our courts. (Para 48)
(2000) 5 SCC 668; (2008) 8 SCC 34 – Relied upon
(h) Administration of Justice – Steps suggested to drastically change or improve the existing system. (Paras 52 and 53)
(i) Administration of Justice – Factors to be taken into considerations for imposing costs stated. (Paras 54 and 55)
Facts of the case:
1. This case is a classic example of how the process of court can be abused to harass an adversary.
2. The respondents lingered the litigation from 1992 to 2011 on one pretext or the other.
3. This case also highlights how non-application of mind and haste in framing issues can cost a party several years of litigation.
4. The appellants’ only motive appears to create obstacles during the course of trial and not to let the trial conclude by filing applications after applications at every stage.
Finding of the Court:
There is no infirmity in the impugned judgment.
Result : Appeal dismissed with cost.
The directions issued by the courts regarding procedural steps and case management are generally considered mandatory, as they are intended to ensure the proper and expeditious disposal of cases (!) . The courts emphasize the importance of adhering to fixed schedules, timely disposal of interlocutory applications, and strict compliance with procedural requirements to prevent unnecessary delays and obstructions (!) (!) .
Failure to follow these directions can lead to consequences such as costs, penalties, or adverse inferences, indicating that these directions are not merely advisory but obligatory for effective judicial functioning (!) (!) . The courts also stress that strict adherence is essential to uphold the integrity of the judicial process and to prevent abuse, delays, and frivolous practices (!) (!) .
In summary, the directions are mandatory because they serve as essential tools to streamline proceedings, promote timely justice, and maintain discipline within the judicial system (!) (!) .
JUDGEMENT
Dalveer Bhandari, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 01.09.2010 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 1084 of 2010 and the order dated 25.10.2010 passed in Review Petition No. 429 of 2010 in Civil Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 1084 of 2010 by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi.
3. The apparent discernible question which requires adjudication in this case seems to be a trivial, insignificant and small one regarding imposition of costs, but in fact, these appeals have raised several important questions of law of great importance which we propose to deal in this judgment. Looking to the importance of the matter we requested Dr. Arun Mohan, a distinguished senior advocate to assist this court as an Amicus Curiae.
4. This is a classic example which abundantly depicts the picture of how the civil litigation moves in our courts and how unscrupulous litigants (appellants in this case) can till eternity harass the respondents and their children by abusing the judicial system.
5. The basic facts which are necessary to dispose of these appeals are recapitulated as under:-
6. In the year 1952, almost about half a century ago, the government allotted a residential house bearing nos. 61-62, I-Block, Lajpat Nagar-I, measuring 200 yards to Ram Parshad. The Lease Deed was executed in his favour on 31.10.1964.
7. On humane considerations of shelter, Ram Parshad allowed his three younger brothers - Madan Lal, Krishan Gopal and Manohar Lal to reside with him in the house. On 16.11.1977, these three younger brothers filed a Civil Suit No.993 of 1977 in the High Court of Delhi claiming that this Lajpat Nagar property belonged to a joint Hindu Family and sought partition of the property on that basis.
8. The suit was dismissed by a judgment dated 18.01.1982 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi. The appellants (younger brothers) of Ram Parshad, aggrieved by the said judgment preferred a Regular First Appeal (Original Side) 4 of 1982 which was admitted to hearing on 09.03.1982. During the pendency of the appeal, Ram Parshad on 15.01.1992 filed a suit against his three younger brothers for mandatory injunction to remove them and for recovery of mesne profits. In 1984 Ram Parshad sold western half (No.61) to an outsider. That matter is no longer in dispute.
9. The first appeal filed by the other three younger brothers of Ram Parshad against Ram Parshad was dismissed on 09.11.2000. Against the concurrent findings of both of the judgments, the appellants filed a Special Leave Petition No.3740 of 2001 in this court which was also dismissed on 16.03.2001.
10. In the suit filed by Ram Parshad (one of the respondents) (now deceased) against the appellants in these appeals the following issues were framed:
1. Whether the suit is liable to be stayed under Section 10 CPC as alleged in para no.1 of Preliminary Objection?
2. Whether defendants are licencees in the suit premises and if so whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of the same from them?
3. Whether suit of plaintiff is time barred?
4. Whether suit has been properly valued for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction?
5. Whether the suit property is joint family property of parties?
6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits for use and occupation of the suit property by the defendants and if so at what rate and for which period?
7. Whether defendants have become the owner of three- fourth share of the suit property by adverse possession?
8. Relief.
and fixed the matter for evidence on 22.11.2004.
11. The defendants in the suit contended that inasmuch as Regular First Appeal (Original Side) 4 of 1982 was still pending, therefore, Ram Parshad’s suit be stayed under section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Accepting the contention, on 20.07.1992, the 1992 suit was ordered to be stayed.
12. The Regular First Appeal was dismissed on 9.11.2000 and the Special leave petition against th
None explicitly identified as overruled, reversed, or explicitly criticized as bad law in the provided list. While many entries reference the case of Ramrameshwari Devi (2011 (8) SCC 249) and its treatment, there is no clear indication in the text that any subsequent decision has explicitly overruled or reversed it. The references to the case are predominantly in the context of following, citing, or applying its principles.
**Followed / Cited / Applied Principles of Ramrameshwari Devi (2011 SCC 249):**
The majority of entries (e.g., [00100050378], [02500055820], [01100063265], [02500055837], [02500056453], [01100034795], [00800031970], [01700025311], [01100034044], [01700046599], [01300020275], [01200042245], [01800030638], [01100045771], [00300036735], [02600006316], [00100051645], [01700025311], [01100037505], [01100037528], [01100037416], [00600006336], [01700047151], [00400045520], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977], [02100116193], [01100040300], [02100114009], [00300026923], [01720091374], [04200002398], [02100104493], [00400044195], [00400042418], [02100108436], [02500061527], [01100038593], [01100039274], [00100057552], [01100038895], [01100039236], [01100059712], [01100038811], [01100038937], [01100038931], [01100041950], [01100039181], [01100039112], [01100039135], [01100039159], [01100039003], [02500062697], [02500078325], [00100056170], [01100041977],
**Source :** Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action VS Union of India - Supreme Court GANESH PRASAD VS L. D. A. LUCKNOW - Allahabad Yudhvir Singh VS Kartar Singh - Delhi U. P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. VS AJAY SINHA - Allahabad U. P. SHASKIYA ADHIVAKTA KALYAN SAMITI, 8, MUSTAFA MARKET, SI VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Sewa International Fashions VS Meenakshi Anand - Delhi Vijay Raghav VS Rizwan - Patna RAMESHWAR DAYAL AGARWAL VS PAWAN KUMAR - Allahabad EAST U. P. SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION LKO. VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes VS Erasmo Jack de Sequeria - Supreme Court Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes VS Erasmo Jack de Sequeria - Rajasthan Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes VS Erasmo Jack de Sequeria (Dead) through L. Rs. - Rajasthan A. Shanmugam VS Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam - Supreme Court Badu Lal Yadav VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Ravi Bagai VS Clintus Network - Delhi Marudhar Services VS Ved Parkash - Delhi Precision Cars India Pvt. Ltd. VS Porsche Middle East & Africa, F. Z. E. - Rajasthan JAGJITSINGH BHAGSINGH ARORA VS VIBHABEN RAJPAL TYAGI - Gujarat Emaar Mgf Land Ltd. VS Lalit Arora - Consumer Mool Raj VS Govind Singh Pathania - Himachal Pradesh Sushil Jain VS Meharban Singh - Delhi Ramakrishna S/O Shivannegowda VS K. T. Sujatha - Karnataka V. CHANDRASEKARAN VS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER - Uttarakhand V. Chandrasekaran VS Administrative Officer - Supreme Court A. D. Overseas VS Sneh Lata Sharma - Delhi S. R. Trust, Meenakshmi Mission Hospital & Research Centre VS S. Ramesh, Trustee, S. R. Trust - Madras Venkateswara Vinayaka Temple Trust Cholanayakanahalli VS Narasaraju - Karnataka Gordhan Lal Agarwal VS Mali Ram Modi - Rajasthan Gordhan Lal Agarwal VS Mali Ram Modi - Current Civil Cases Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. VS Aishwarya Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Lakshmipathy - Madras Suresh Bhat VS Pedro Damiao Lazario Caeiro - Bombay Union of India, Through Central Public Works Department, Represented by the Superintendent Engineer, Goa Central VS Domnic Issac - Bombay Capital Film Works (India) Ltd. VS Thiagarajan Kumararaja - Madras S. N. A. RIZVI VS U. P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD - Allahabad TEN MATAN HELIA THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR VS MERCURY LABORATORIES LIMITED - Allahabad Irugurala Laxmi, Pathem Padma, Inreddy Srinivas Reddy, Bandari Rayudu, Gantala Vijaya VS Shakti Farm Machinery - Consumer Indo Phytochem Pharmaceuticals VS National Insurance Company Ltd. - Consumer Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Patiala VS Atma Singh Grewal - Supreme Court Aura Serafina Crispina de Souza VS Vitorino Mendonca - Bombay Ramsarup Industries Ltd. VS Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd. - Delhi Vijay Ghai VS Pal Singh Kartar Singh - Delhi Ambica Plastopack Pvt Ltd. VS State - Delhi Inderjeet Kaur Kalsi VS NCT of Delhi - Dishonour Of Cheque Govind Saini VS Prabhu Dayal - Rajasthan Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe - Bombay MAHESH PRASAD AGARWAL VS REGISTRAR, FIRMS, SOCIETIES AND CHITS, U. P. - Allahabad Grand Vasant Residents Wel. Ass VS DDA - Delhi Cottage Industries Exposition VS Amritpal Kaur - Delhi Phool Chandra VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court Padmini Technology VS Jyoti Sarup Mittal - Delhi Goutam Bhadra VS Gouri Bhadra - Delhi ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SHANTI DEVI - Delhi S. B. Sharma VS Shree Adya Katyayani Shaktipeeth ( Mandir) Trust - Delhi New India Assurance Co. VS Virender Singh - Delhi Parminder Singh VS Virender Pal Singh Jolly - Delhi A. I. I. M. S. New Delhi VS Uddal & Ors. - Delhi Jagdamba Impex VS Tristar Products - Delhi Ashok Kapoor VS Municipal Corporation of Delhi - Delhi Kamla Kumar VS Kamlesh Kumar - Delhi Kundan Lal VS State - Delhi Nidhi Kaushik VS Union of India - Delhi RAHEES @ BAURA VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Poonam VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Satti Paradesi Samadhi & Philliar Temple VS M. Sankuntala - Supreme Court Devender Pal Singh VS Rajan Pal Singh - Delhi P. Subramania Chetty VS P. N. Narayana - Madras Lahorian Di Hatti VS Shyam Lal Meher Chand Jain Huf - Delhi Ram Gopal VS Purshottam Dass - Delhi Mathew Enterprises VS Nithyanandam - Madras Ram Krishna Soni VS State of U. P. - Allahabad AHARWAS SINGH @ ATARWAS SINGH VS LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LUCKNOW - Allahabad JAGDEV SINGH VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Jayamani VS District Collector, Tiruvallur District - Madras Conservation Assistant, Gingee Fort Archaeological Survey of India VS Ramachandira Ramanuja Dasar - Madras Swaran Singh VS Balwinder Singh - Punjab and Haryana Virendra Kumar Dixit VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Karthik Homes, Rep. by its Partner M. Latha Chendur Illam, Chennai VS S. Manvizhi - Madras Jagdish Singh VS Amba Lal - Rajasthan Kusum Sharma VS Mahinder Kumar Sharma - Delhi Pradeep Khanna VS Renu Khetarpal - Delhi SAKKEER VS DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, TRIVANDRUM - Kerala CE Construction Ltd. VS Intertoll ICS India (P) Ltd. - Delhi Inder Raj Agarwal VS Union of India - Andhra Pradesh HS Bedi VS National Highway Authority of India - Delhi Khatun VS Adinath Textiles - Rajasthan IN THE MATTER OF : SHIELD SHOE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) VS RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION - Rajasthan ANIL GULATI VS PROMILA GULATI - Delhi RAKESH GUPTA VS RAMESH GUPTA - Delhi Harish Relan VS Kaushal Kumari Relan - Delhi P. Parameshwar Reddy VS State of Telangana - Andhra Pradesh Sehdev Singh Verma VS J. P. S Verma - Current Civil Cases SEHDEV SINGH VERMA VS J P S VERMA - Delhi New Delhi Municipal Council VS Prominent Hotels Limited - Delhi KUSUM KUMRIA VS PHARMA VENTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. - Delhi Jailal VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana Kumari Sushila Yadav VS Lt. Col. (Retd. ) Atul Chaudhary - Delhi H. S. Bedi VS National Highway Authority of India - Delhi Inder Singh VS Bheem Singh - Rajasthan Messer Holdings Ltd. VS Shyam Madanmohan Ruia - Supreme Court Business Institute of Management Studies VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh J. S. Chauhan VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh KAMLESH SHERAWAT VS LALJI PATEL - Delhi Pratap Singh Verma VS State of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh BADUVAN KUNHI VS K. M. ABDULLA - Kerala AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA VS HOTEL LEELAVENTURE LTD. - Delhi Prakash Chand VS Durga Singh - Himachal Pradesh Gyan Ganga Education Academy through its Chairman VS Suman Dheer, wife of Shri B. K. Dheer - Chhattisgarh Shanti Devi W/o late Sukhram VS Rahul Khanna S/o Sri N. N. Khanna - Uttarakhand Sumeer Nath VS Mohan Lal - Himachal Pradesh Gyan Infra Build Pvt. Ltd. VS Mamta Sinha @ Rupam - Patna BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VS ADESH KUMAR GUPTA - Allahabad Lal Keshari Devi VS Kamla Devi - Patna Rajvanta Devi VS D. D. C. Deoria - Allahabad Hriday Narayan Kumar VS Jaya Singh - Patna Rajesh Kumar VS Union of India - Punjab and Haryana Somesh Pandeya, S/o. Late Parmanand Pandeya VS Viseshwar Prasad Pandeya, S/o. late Jaggannath Pandeya (Died) through - Chhattisgarh Mohmmad Iliyash VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana Harak Nath Yadav VS Mosmat Meena Devi - Patna Sanjeet Singh VS Kamlesh Singh - Chhattisgarh Sanjeet Singh VS Kamlesh Singh - Current Civil Cases Subodh Shiksha Samiti, Rambagh Circle, Jaipur VS Gopi Chand Tetarwal S/o Shri Data Ram - Rajasthan Manoj S/o Mohanlal Bilala VS Arvind s/o Laxman Mulay - Bombay Maheshwari Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. VS Vijay Shree Tea Company - Rajasthan Maheshwari Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. VS Vijay Shree Tea Company - Rajasthan Nanu Ram Adopted VS Chhoti Devi - Rajasthan Yogesh Chaudhary VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Manishankar Oils Pvt. Ltd VS S. V. M. Oil Industries - Rajasthan HARISH RELAN VS KAUSHAL KUMARI RELAN - Delhi STATE OF U. P. VS ANANT RAM AWASTHI - Allahabad Sagar Gambhir VS Sukhdev Singh Gambhir (Since Deceased) Thr His Legal Heirs - Delhi General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), Balwakhani VS Radhika Chettri W/o Late Bhakta Bahadur Chettri - Sikkim KRISHAN KUMAR VS ASHOK LEYLAND FINANCE LTD. - Consumer Abid Hussain Khan VS Jaspal - Uttarakhand Om Prakash Tyagi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad N. RAM VS UNION OF INDIA - Allahabad Hukmi Devi VS Madan - Himachal Pradesh UNION OF INDIA VS SYED QZAIR AHMAD - Allahabad Amrawati Devi VS Up Shiksha Nideshak - Allahabad Bhamidimarri Vijaya Lakshmi VS M. Uma Lakshmi - Andhra Pradesh ARUN KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad O. P. JATAV VS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. - Allahabad OM PRAKASH UPADHYAY VS NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Allahabad NAVIN KUMAR SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA - Allahabad Jai Mata Naina Devi Filling Station VS Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. - Himachal Pradesh Ramkumar Singhai VS Komal Prasad - Madhya Pradesh Praveen Saini VS Reetu Kapur - Delhi DSL Enterprises Private Limited VS Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution - Bombay Shirka Constructions VS Appollo Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay Shanthi Engineering Works, Rep. By Mr. Vijay, Managing Partner VS T. K. K. N. N. Vysya Charities, Rep by its Managing Trustee, Mr. D. V. S. Prasad - Madras Global Plastics VS T. K. K. N. N. Vysya Charities - Madras Abu Nasar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Sundru Devi VS Shanti Devi - Himachal Pradesh Surat Singh VS Dhaju Ram - Himachal Pradesh Siddavarapu Anantha Sigvarama Krishna Reddy VS Penna Cement Industries Limited (PICL) - Andhra Pradesh Sureshkumar Shankarlal Miglani VS Davindarkumar Chamanlal Batra - Bombay Mohammad Ali Saraf Ali VS Jasabhai Lakhabhai Bharwad - Gujarat VIJAY NARAIN VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad State of Gujarat VS Arvindbhai Khodidashai Kachhiya - Gujarat DEEN MOHAMMAD VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Kismat Singh VS Piariya Devi - Delhi PUSHP SHARMA VS D. B. CORP. LTD. - Delhi Ramesh Dudani VS Madhavi Ramesh Dudani - Bombay NLC India Limited Corporate Office VS SICAL Logistics Limited - Madras Ashok Kumar Sood VS Sardar Darshan Singh - Himachal Pradesh PRANESH GUPTA VS JAGDISH BANSILAL KHURANA - Delhi R. Gopalakrishnan VS K. Mani - Madras Quintessential Designs India Pvt. Ltd. VS Puma Sports India (Pvt. ) Ltd. - Madras State of U. P. VS Bheem Singh - Allahabad All India Institute Of Medical Sciences VS Sanjiv Chaturvedi - Supreme Court U. P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. VS Sneh Lata Gupta - Allahabad Rajeev Tandon VS Rashmi Tandon - Delhi JAYASWAL ASHOKA INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD VS PANSARE LAWAD SALLAGAR - Bombay Vijendra Singh VS State of UP - Allahabad Basanta Manjari Devi VS Santosh Sablok - Orissa Sandeep Singh VS Pratap Singh - Delhi Sriram Singh VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad Sharokh Kersi Nikorawalla VS Khorshed Faredoon Dalal - Bombay Sharokh Kersi Nikorawalla VS Khorshed Faredoon Dalal - Bombay T. K. K. N. N. Vysya Charaties VS Global Plastics - Madras T. K. K. N. N. Vysya Charaties, Chennai VS Mahalakshmi Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner S. P. Jeyaprakash - Madras Hitkari Welfare Society VS State Of Haryana And Others (2) Triveni Faridabad Allottees Association - Punjab and Haryana Balwant Singh Chauhan VS Mahavidyalaya Sabha Jwalapur Haridwar - Uttarakhand Mukesh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Rahul Kumar Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Manisha Sampatrao Bhosale VS Balkrishna Shamrao Mhapralkar - Bombay Sat Dev Singh VS State of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh Suraj Parkash Badyal VS Chander Molli Badyal - Jammu and Kashmir Gordhanbhai Keshavbhai Patel VS Narendrakumar Raghavjibhai Patel - Gujarat Quintessential Designs India Pvt. Ltd. VS Puma Sports India (Pvt. ) Ltd. - Madras Aditya Sharma VS Union of India - Allahabad Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company VS BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. - Delhi Veejay Facility Management Private Limited VS Zonal Manager, Bank of India, A & S Department, “Star House” - Bombay Veejay Facility Management Private Limited VS Zonal Manager, Bank Of India - Bombay Thomas V. Y. @ Sajimon, S/o. Late Yohannan VS Joseph V. Y. , S/o. Late Yohannan - Kerala Sushil Kumar Agarwal VS Ravi Narayan Agarwal - Delhi Vijay Pal VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. VS Maharia Raj Joint Venture - Current Civil Cases P. S. Kirubakaran VS Azizul Karim - Madras S Prasanna, S/O. Late A. Srinivasan VS Nanjamma, W/O. Late Ramanna - Karnataka Raghupati R. Bhandari VS Comunidade of Bandora - Bombay Prem Lal Yadav S/o Shri Dev Charan Yadav VS Rajendra Prasad Chandravansi S/o Siddha Ram Chandravansi - Chhattisgarh Prem Lal Yadav VS Rajendra Prasad Chandravansi - Chhattisgarh Pritpal Kaur VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana Namdeo Vishnu Salgaonkar Alias Joao Augusto Cardozo VS Subhash B Velingkar - Bombay UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED VS MANJEET KAUR - Uttarakhand Varun Dhiman VS State Of H P & Ors. - Himachal Pradesh Tirupati Storage and Allied (P) Ltd. & Ors. VS United Commercial Bank, represented by its Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer - Patna Tirupati Storage and Allied (P) Ltd. VS United Commercial Bank - Current Civil Cases Sri Lankappa VS Karnataka Industrial Corporation - Supreme Court Jayant Industries VS Indian Tobacco Company - Bombay Super Build India Private Limited VS Sanjay Agrawal - Telangana K. Somanath Nayak VS D. Veerendra Heggade - Karnataka Late Pingili Prasad Rao, died per L. Rs. VS Pingili Vidya Sankar Gokul - Telangana Santa Singh S/o Sh. Gulzar Singh VS Mahinder Kaur W/o Sh. Ajayab Singh - Himachal Pradesh Ram Lal VS Santosh Chauhan - Rajasthan Sumit Sharma, Son Of Shri Sansar Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary (Gad) - Himachal Pradesh S. R. Cold Storage VS Union Of India - Allahabad Varun Gupta VS Union Of India - Allahabad Kuljeet Singh VS Kulwinder Kaur - Punjab and Haryana Kewal Ashokabhai Vasoya VS Suarabhakti Goods Pvt. Ltd - Bombay Smita Gupta W/o Shri Dheeraj Kumar Lal VS Dheeraj Kumar Lal S/o Shri Chandra Kishore Lal - Jharkhand Pankajbhai Narotamdas Raithatha VS Authorized Officer of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. - Gujarat Kewal Ashokbhai Vasoya VS Suarabhakti Goods Pvt Ltd - Bombay Nama Ramaprasad VS Kristam Reddy Raju - Andhra Pradesh Shree Sai Rolling Mills (India) Ltd. , rep. by its Authorized Director- Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bhagat VS North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (NEDFI) - Gauhati Shailesh Khandelwal VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Ranju Devi VS Chitranjan Singh - Patna U. P. Sunni Central Waqf Board VS Ancient Idol Of Swayambhu Lord Vishweshwar - Allahabad Vijay Kumar Tevraiya S/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Tevraiya VS Registrar Public Trust and Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Tikamgarh - Madhya Pradesh Kishan Chandra Jain VS State of U. P. - Allahabad State of U. P. VS Raj Veer Singh - Allahabad NAVINCHANDRA HANSRAJBHAI LAKHIAR V/s JAMNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Gujarat Sami Ahmad VS Dhirendra Kumar Jain - Jharkhand G. Krishnamurthy VS Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies - Karnataka Amanulla Molla VS Monoranjan Mridha - Calcutta Bharat Rashtra Samithi, Nalgonda VS State of Telangana - Telangana Pidilite Industries Limited Vs Astra Chemtech Private Limited & Ors. - Bombay Pidilite Industries Limited Vs Astra Chemtech Private Limited & Ors. - Bombay Sree Lekshmi Cashew Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs Barrow Lane and Ballard Ltd. - Kerala Mahila Vinod Kumar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court Swaran Singh VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
