Back
2009 Supreme(SC) 828
2011 (2) SCC 456
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA AND AFTAB ALAM, JJ.
UNION TERRITORY ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS – Petitioners;
Versus
MANJU MATHUR AND ANOTHER - Respondents.
SLP (C) No. 10551 of 2005
Decided on : April 24, 2009
Kamini Jaiswal, Advocate, for the Petitioners;
Shyam Divan, Senior Advocate (Rajinder Mathur, Advocate), for the Respondents.
Headnote:Service Law – Conditions of service – Dietician – UT vis-à-vis State of Punjab – Administration directed to appoint high level Equivalence committee to examine nature of duties and responsibilities of Senior Dietician (UT) vis-à-vis Dietician (Gazetted) in the State of Punjab – Committee also to undertake similar exercise for Dietician in the Union Territory vis-a-vis Dietician (non-Gazetted) in the State of Punjab. (Para 1)
Facts of the case:
Dispute in this case is regarding service conditions of Dieticians in UT Admn. of Chandigarh vis-à-vis State of Punjab.
Result:
UT directed to appoint a High Level Equivalence Committee.
JUDGMENT :
1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. Pending hearing and final disposal of the civil appeal we are directing the Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh to appoint a High Level Equivalence Committee within. a period of eight weeks. The Committee will examine the nature of the duties and responsibilities of Senior Dietician working in the Union Territory vis-a-vis Dietician (Gazetted) in the State of Punjab. That similar exercise needs to be undertaken for Dietician in the Union Territory vis-a-vis Dietician (non-Gazetted) in the State of Punjab. The Equivalence Committee is directed to submit its report before 18-11-2009.
2. List the matter on 18-11-2009.
Court Masters
