SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 884

S. H. KAPADIA, K. S. P. RADHAKRISHNAN, SWATANTER KUMAR
COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL AID TO POOR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate (Ms Ritu Kumar and Ms Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocates) for the Petitioner;
P.P. Malhotra, Additional Solicitor General, Dr. Manish Singhvi, Additional Advocate General, A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, Sikkim, and Jayant K. Sud [Anand Vardhan Sharma, Aarohi Bhalla, Ms Anil Katiyar, Avijit Bhattacharjee, Ms Ananya Kar, Ms Sarbani Kar, Bidyabrata Acharya, Ms C.K. Sucharita, Ms Nirada Das, Gopal Singh, Manish Kumar, Rituraj Biswas, Ms Hemantika Wahi, Nupur Kanungo, Shreekant N. Terdal, Ms Padmalakshmi Nigam, Ms Sadhana Sandhu, S.S. Rawat, D.S. Mahra, V.G. Pragasam, S.J. Aristotle, Prabhu Ramasubramanian, L.A.J. Selvam, Anil Kr. Jha, Santosh Kumar, Saurabh Mishra, B.S. Banthia, Kh. Nobin Singh, Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Sanjay V. Kharde, Ms Navneet Kaur (for M/s Corporate Law Group), Jatinder Kr. Bhatia, P.V. Dinesh, T. Harish Kumar, Ambar Qamaruddin, Ajay Pal, Abhinav Ram Krishna, Prashant Shukla, Abhishek Atrey, Vishal Yadav, Devanshu Kr. Devesh, Milind Kumar, Sahil S. Chauhan, Ranjan Mukherjee, S. Bhowmick, S.C. Ghosh, Edward Belho, Ms K. Enatoli Serna, Rituraj Biswas, Ms Arona Mathur, Ammjeet Singh Girsa, Manish Singhvi, P.V. Yogeswaran, Ms Jayshree Anand, K.K. Mahalik, Ajay Pal, Manjit Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Anil Shrivastav, A. Ramesh, D. Mahesh Babu, Ms A. Subhashini, Ms Satya Siddiqui, Shailendra Kr. Mishra, K.N. Madhusoodhan, R. Sathish, Aman Rai Gandhi and Balaji Srinivasan, Advocates] for the Respondents.

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been filed by an NGO making a grievance that registration of births in India is at a low level and that very few children are provided with birth certificates and that the provisions of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1969 Act") are not being implemented.

2. Under Section 3 of the 1969 Act, the Central Government is required to appoint a Registrar General and such other officers to coordinate and unify the activities of the Chief Registrars of the States and submit an annual report to the Central Government on the working of the 1969 Act.

3. The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that relevant provisions of the 1969 Act are not being implemented.

4. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel, appearing on both sides, submitted before us by consent Minutes of the Order. The said Minutes are taken on record and marked ‘x’.

5. In terms of the said Minutes we direct the States/Union Territories to appoint full-time Chief Registrars. That the States/Union Territories will submit their reports annually, as required under the provisions of the 1969 Act. That the States/Union Territories






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top