ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, P.SATHASIVAM
Sundar Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned single Judge of the Madras High Court rejecting the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code').
2. Background facts in short are as follows:
Sukanya (hereinafter referred to as `the complainant') was married with Sunder Babu-appellant No. 1. Appellant No. 2-Mr. Venugopal and Mrs. Ramathilagam appellant No. 3 are the parents of Sunder Babu. A.4-Rajinishree is his sister and Andalammal is his maternal grandmother. The marriage took place on 25/11/1998. The appellant No. 1 left for USA on 1/7/1999. The complaint was filed on 6/2/2000 alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (in short `D.P. Act').
3. The complaint was treated as First Information Report and investigation was undertaken. On completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed on 8/6/2000. A divorce petition was filed by the complainant which appears to have been granted ex parte on 12/7/2001. According to the appellants, complainant-Sukanya has remarried on 24/8/20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.