SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 314

ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, P.SATHASIVAM
Sundar Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Joseph Pookkatt, Gaurav Agrawal and Prashant Kumar, Advs
S. Thannanjayan, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned single Judge of the Madras High Court rejecting the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code').

2. Background facts in short are as follows:

Sukanya (hereinafter referred to as `the complainant') was married with Sunder Babu-appellant No. 1. Appellant No. 2-Mr. Venugopal and Mrs. Ramathilagam appellant No. 3 are the parents of Sunder Babu. A.4-Rajinishree is his sister and Andalammal is his maternal grandmother. The marriage took place on 25/11/1998. The appellant No. 1 left for USA on 1/7/1999. The complaint was filed on 6/2/2000 alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (in short `D.P. Act').

3. The complaint was treated as First Information Report and investigation was undertaken. On completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed on 8/6/2000. A divorce petition was filed by the complainant which appears to have been granted ex parte on 12/7/2001. According to the appellants, complainant-Sukanya has remarried on 24/8/20















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top