SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 1053

V.N.KHARE, R.N.AGGARWAL, ASHOK BHAN
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY – Appellant
Versus
KISAN GANGARAM HIRE – Respondent


ORDER

1. One Shantaram Kisan Hire, aged 36 years, died in a motor accident on 12-1-1980 by the vehicle owned by the appellant herein. The dependants of the deceased claimed compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. However, in the petition the claimants claimed compensation to the extent of Rs 75,000. However, the Tribunal, on the basis of evidence on record, found that a sum of Rs 1,05,000 would be just and reasonable compensation and, accordingly, awarded a sum of Rs 1,05,000 along with six per cent interest towards compensation. Aggrieved, an appeal was filed by the appellant before the High Court. The High Court, by the judgment under challenge, dismissed the appeal. It is against the said judgment, the appellant is in appeal before us.

2. Learned counsel urged that once the claimants claimed only a sum of Rs 75,000 as compensation, they were not entitled to any amount over and above the said sum and as such the Tribunal committed a manifest error in awarding higher amount as compensation. We do not find any merit in the contention. Under Section 110-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, it is within the province of the Tribunal to award compensation, which is just.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top