SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 834

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.B.SHAH, DORAISWAMY RAJU, S.N.VARIAVA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SARATHI TEXTILES – Respondent


ORDER

1. Pursuant to the earlier order dated 5-8-2002 the learned counsel e appearing for the respondents on instructions, states that the respondent is willing to pay interest @ 12% per annum in settlement of the dispute in issue. While, therefore, keeping the points of law open, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondent would pay simple interest @ 12% per annum, within eight weeks from today. On the payment in question, the title deed will be returned. The special leave petition accordingly stands f disposed of.

Special Leave Petition No. 9298 of 2000

2. The order of reference does not indicate as to why this petition has been referred to the Constitution Bench.

3. The learned Solicitor General appearing for the petitioner Bank advanced before us serious arguments on the interpretation of Order 34 Rules 2, 3, 4 and 11 and argued as to the discretion of the Court in the matter of grant of interest and how the same should be interpreted notwithstanding the fact that there are several earlier decisions of this Court including the decision in Soli Pestonji Majoo v. Gangadhar Khomkal.

4. The present proceeding arises out of an application filed before the Debts R


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top