SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 8

(2009) 16 Supreme Court Cases 600
K.T. THOMAS AND D.P. MOHAPATRA, JJ.
RAMESH NARANG (2) – Petitioner
Versus
RAMA NARANG AND OTHERS – Respondents.
CPs (C) Nos. 265-67 of 1999 in CP (C) No. 209 of 1998 in CAs Nos. 366, 603 and 605 of 1998 with IAs Nos. 1-2 with IAs Nos. 3-4 in CPs (C) Nos. 326-27 of 1999,6-8 of 2000 in IAs Nos. 5,7-9, 10-12, 13 with CPs (C) Nos. 320-22 of 2001 in IAs Nos. 7-9 of 2000 with TCs (C) Nos. 1 to 8 of 2002
Decided on : January 8,2002

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950, Article 139-A - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(b) - Contempt proceedings – Show cause notice - Settlement – Recorded in terms of Minutes of consent order - Contempt petition dropped.

       [Paras 4 to 6]

ORDER

1. Pursuant to the order dated 12-12-2001 the following suits and company petition have been transmitted to this Court and they are on the file of this Court now and registered as Transferred Cases Nos. 1 to 8 of 2002:

1. as No. 3535 of 1994 before the Bombay High Court.

2. as No. 3578 of 1994 before the Bombay High Court.

3. as No. 1105 of 1998 before the Bombay High Court.

4. as No. 3469 of 1996 before the Bombay High Court.

5. as No. 1792 of 1998 before the Bombay High Court.

6. as No. 320 of 1991 before the Bombay High Court.

7. Company Petition No. 28 of 1992 before the Principal Bench, Company Law Board, New Delhi.

8. Arbitration Suit No. 5110 of 1994 before the Bombay High Court.

2. All the above are now being disposed of in terms of the minutes of the consent order incorporated in the proceedings passed by us on 12-12-2001.

3. The decree will be drawn up in terms of the minutes. of the consent order.

4. In regard to the property (64, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi) which is the subject-matter of as No. 3578 of 1994 in the High Court of Bombay, Rama Narang, who is present in Court, gives an undertaking that the same would be transferred with clear and marketable title to Rajesh Narang or his nominee on or before 31-3-2002. This undertaking is recorded:

5. In the light of the above developments we deem it necessary to drop the steps against Rama Narang for contempt pursuant to the order of this Court dated 2-11-20011.

6. We order so. Similarly, all other contempt petitions are dropped and IAs and transferred cases are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top