SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1063

TARUN CHATTERJEE, B.P.SINGH
SANJIV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. SINGH, J.- The appellant herein has appealed by special leave impugning the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 482-SB of 1993 dated 2-2-2005 affirming his conviction under Section 304-B and 498-A of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC and affirming the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for seven years and two years respectively on those counts. The sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

2. The facts of the case are that the appellant, Sanjiv Kumar was married to deceased, Raj Rani about 41\2 months before the occurrence which is alleged to have taken place on 24-8-1991. The case of the prosecution is that the matrimonial home of the deceased was at Village Gobindpura. Her parents resided at Village Khadayal at a distance of 150 km. One of the brothers-in-law of the deceased, namely, Balwant Rai is a resident of Village Ghunder which is at a distance of about 5 km from Village Gobindpura.

3. The case of the prosecution is that fifteen days after her marriage when the deceased came to Village Khadayal she complained to her family members that her husband, the appellant herein, as also her in-laws, namely, Sanjiv
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top