SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1120

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, B.S.CHAUHAN
Santoshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER

1. The present appeal is filed by the appellants, who have been convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC'). Appellant No. 1, Santoshi s/o Maniram Rathore, has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- by the Trial Court. The said conviction and period of sentence was also upheld by the High Court. So far as the remaining appellants are concerned, they were also convicted under Section 498A, IPC. But in case of two of them, i.e. Brahma and Maniram, the sentence awarded was three years rigorous imprisonment and with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each and in case of the remaining two the sentence awarded was for a period of one and half years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- by each one of them. The High Court, however, altered the sentence of the appellant Nos. 2 to 5 and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for a term of one year and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- by each.

2. In the appeal, notice was issued. So far as appellant Nos. 2 to 5 are concerned, they were released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court during the pendency of this appeal. The appeal is


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top