SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1047

JT2009(9)SC169, 2009(7)SCALE157, (2009)16SCC743, [2009]8SCR1055
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Altamas kabir and Cyriac Joseph
M.D., Ramakrishna Poultry P. Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
R. Chellappan and Ors. Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3413 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 24713/2008)
Decided On: 08.05.2009

Advocates Appeared
S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., Prasanth P., V. Vasudevan and K.V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, Advs
Parag Tripathi, A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam, Sr. Advs., V. Prabhakar, Ramjee Prasad, Revathy Raghavan, Nitin Thukral, Yashodharan Anand, Kunal Bahri, Advs. for Parckh & Co., R. Nedumaran and P. Soma Sundaram, Advs.

Headnote:Constitution of India, Article 136 - Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Sections 10(d), 16 and 17 - Electricity Act, 2003, Section 164 - Electricity - High Voltage Transmission Lines passing over the poultry sheds – Sought to be removed – Plea that such wires adversely effect the performance and health of the bird – Same is based upon opinion by Assistant Director, Department of Animal Husbandry - Power Grid Corporation directed to increase height from 52 meters to 56 meters – Distence between lowers point of the sag of the cable and the top most portion of the poultry shed should not be less than 40 ft. - Appellant also entitled to compensation as provided under Telegraph Act.

       [Paras 26 to 28]

JUDGMENT

Altamas Kabir, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant is a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of poultry farming which is confined to the production of eggs. It has constructed three separate sheds on Survey Nos. 242/2 and 249/3 in Nanniyur Pudur Village in Karur District in the State of Tamil Nadu for accommodating about 1.25 lakh layer birds. It is the case of the appellant that it had invested a sum of about Rs. 6 crores in acquiring the lands, erecting the sheds thereupon and acquiring the birds for the purpose of starting the poultry farm.

3. At this juncture, it may be noted that the lands on which the poultry farm was started by the appellant, had been acquired in two stages. About 11 acres of land were acquired by the appellant- Company on 23rd June, 2004 and about 4 acres were acquired on 19th November, 2004.

5. At about the same time, the 3rd respondent, The Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as `the Corporation') took up the work of construction of a 400 KV Perambalur - Pugalur D/C Line as part of the Neyveli Thermal Station Expansion Project for evacuation of electricity generated therein. In the process, transmission towers were required to be installed in various locations, some of which were private lands, including the Patta lands of the appellant, where its poultry farm is situated.

6. On 8th October, 2006, the appellant sought an opinion from the Assistant Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, regarding the effect on the layer birds on account of emission of electro magnetic fields from the High Voltage Transmission Lines passing over the poultry sheds. According to the said authority, the passing of High Voltage Electricity Current Transmission Wires over the poultry sheds would adversely affect the performance and health of the birds in the long run.

7. The appellant thereupon filed Writ Petition No. 6850/06 before the High Court, seeking a re- alignment of the transmission lines so that either the appellant's poultry sheds could be avoided or the height of the tower/pylon could be raised. Relying on an earlier order dated 18th January, 2007, passed by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High court in Writ Petition No. 49172/06, the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court by his judgment and order dated 31st January, 2007, disposed of the said Writ Petition, along with other connected writ petitions, with liberty to the writ petitioners to submit their objections, if any, to the District Magistrate concerned, within a period of two weeks from the date of the order. The District Magistrate was directed to consider the same in the light of the order passed by the Court and pass an order on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity to the petitioners, as well as the respondents, to make out their respective cases, within a period of six weeks thereafter.

8. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the District Magistrate issued notice to the appellant and the Corporation to file objections, if any. The appellant filed its objections indicating the damage that would be caused to the poultry farm, if the transmission line was not shifted to avoid the poultry sheds. The appellant asked for a small deviation of the route of the power line in the eastward direction, within his lands, so that minimum damage was effected to the poultry farm. On the other hand, the Corporation submitted that no deviation of the transmission line from the approved route of alignment was feasible. After a spot inspection, the District Magistrate upon being satisfied as to the damage that was likely to be caused to the appellant's poultry farm, was of the view that a slight shift in the alignment of the power line from location No. 145 to location No. 144, either westward or eastward, might not cause extensive damage to the coconut trees or the temple indicated by the respondents, while, at the same time, it would not affect the health of the birds in the poultry farm. Ac






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top