B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.SATHASIVAM, G.S.SINGHVI
M. C. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
IAs Nos. 2290-91 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no further orders are required to be passed in these IAs. Accordingly, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these IAs. Accordingly these applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
IA No. 2199 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985
2. It is reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous and no further orders are required to be passed. The IA is dismissed as infructuous.
IA No. 2349 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985
3. The IA is dismissed.
IAs Nos. 2320-21 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no further orders are required to be passed in these applications. Accordingly, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these IAs. Accordingly these applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
IAs Nos. 2418-19 and 2420-21
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these applications with a liberty to approach the Monitoring Committee. This order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach the Monitoring Committee. All the four applications are accordingly dismissed.
IAs Nos. 2398-99 of 2009
6. List
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.