SAURASHTRA CHEMICALS LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2000 Supreme(SC) 1034

S.P.BHARUCHA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
SAURASHTRA CHEMICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
V. Lakshmikumaran and V. Balachandran, Advocates, for the Petitioner;
K.N. Raval, Additional Solicitor General, Gopal Subramanium and T.R. Andhyarujina, Senior Advocates (Ajit Kr. Sinha, K.C. Bajaj, S.C. Malik, Suhail Nathani, Imtiaz Ahmed, P. Parameswaran and Ms Nandini Gore, Advocates) for the Respondents.

ORDER

We see no reason whatsoever to entertain these special leave petitions. It is perfectly clear now that we have seen the provisions of the Act that the order of the designated authority is purely recommendatory. The appeal that lies is against the determination and that determination has to be made by the Central Government. For this reason, we decline to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and dismiss the special leave petitions.

Court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2000 Supreme(SC) 1034

S.P.BHARUCHA, SHIVARAJ V.PATILSAURASHTRA CHEMICALS LIMITED – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – Respondent

S.P.BHARUCHA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
SAURASHTRA CHEMICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent