SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 168

P. SATHASIVAM, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Nilendra Pratap Singh – Respondent


ORDER

C.A. No. 3625/2004:

1. Delink and list separately. Rest of the appeals:

2. These are appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The appellant State had allotted charnoi land to landless persons belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes. According to the appellant, this was done as part of the implementation of the mandate contained under Article 46 of the Constitution of India. Various persons belonging to non-S.C./S.T.s filed writ petitions before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh alleging that the allotment of land exclusively to S.C.s/S.T.s was not proper and similar extend of land should be allotted to such persons. The High Court, by the impugned judgment, has held that the classification made by the State was not proper and others were also entitled to get allotment of land and ultimately the High Court has directed that the State shall endeavour to arrange land allotment equivalizing land allotted to the S.C.s/S.T.s and the unoccupied land shall thus be allotted to such persons. Though notice was served on the respondents, nobody has appeared when the case was called out. The appellant State has filed an affidavit on 29.1.2007 to the effect that the charnoi land is no





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top