SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 748

G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
PRAN SUKH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms Pragati Neekhra, Additional Advocate General, Amarendera Sharan, Jawahar Lal Gupta, S.K. Bagaria and P.S. Narasimha, Senior Advocates [Ravindra Bana, b D.P. Singh, Sanjay Jain, Vinay Arora, Vivek Kochar, Bhupender Yadav, Vikrant Yadav, S.S. Shamshery (for R.C. Kohli), M.C. Dhingra, R. Bansal, Ms Amita Gupta, Neeraj Gaur (for Parmanand Gaur), Manoj Swamp, Ankit Swamp, Devesh Kumar, Ashok Kumar (for Ajay Kumar), Naresh Kaushik, Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj (for Ms Lalitha Kaushik), Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Puneet Taneja, Gagan Gupta, Anil Mittal, Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Satish Kr. Gupta, Dr. Kailash Chand, Suryanarayana Singh, Karan Dewan, Pavan Malik, B.K. Satija, Dr. M.S. Verma, Anil Prakash Gupta, Ms. S. Janani and Jay Salva, Advocates] for the appearing parties.

JUDGMENT

1. Delay condoned. Permission to file SLP is granted in SLP (C) No.8209 of 2008. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.

2. These appeals, most of which have been filed by Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (for short "the Corporation") and some have been filed by the landowners, are directed against the judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby market value of the land acquired for setting up an industrial model township at Manesar has been enhanced and the Corporation has been directed to pay higher compensation to the e landowners. While the Corporation is aggrieved by fixation of higher market value by the High Court and has prayed for reducing the same, the landowners have prayed for further enhancement of the compensation.

3. CAs Nos. 6553, 6757, 6831 and 6853 of 2009 and the appeals arising out of SLPs (C) Nos. 16283-84 of 2010 are directed against the orders passed by the High Court dismissing the regular first appeals of the landowners as barred by time.

4. For the sake of convenient reference, the appeals have been divided into three groups. The first group comprises of the appeals preferred by the Corporation and the landowners







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top