SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 985

R.M.LODHA, AFTAB ALAM
Ram Ratan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rohit Minocha, Adv.
Irshad Ahmad, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Aftab Alam, J.

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated August 27, 2009 passed by a learned single judge of the Rajasthan High Court in the appellant's appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 1139 of 2006) from the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed against him by the trial court.

4. The Special Court, Kota, specified under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, by its judgment and order dated October 16, 2006 in Sessions Case No. 89 of 2006, convicted the appellant under Sections 307, 326 and 324 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of Rs. 500 (in default 1 month's simple imprisonment) under Section 307, imprisonment for 5 years and a fine of Rs. 500 (in default 1 month's simple imprisonment) under Section 326 and imprisonment for one year under Section 324 of the Penal Code. All the sentences were to run concurrently.

5. The High Court disposed of the appeal by a brief order that runs into no more than four pages and a few lines in the paper book. On the first half page the High Court stated the sections u







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top