SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 957

MARKANDEY KATJU, T.S.THAKUR
Samjuben Gordhanbhai Koli – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This Appeal, by special leave, has been filed against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat dated 17.12.2003 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 812 of 1995.

3. The facts have been set out in the impugned judgment and order and hence we are not repeating the same here.

4. Having carefully perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court, we are of the opinion that there is no infirmity in the same. The High Court has dealt with the matter in great detail and upheld the conviction of the appellant. We see no reason to disagree with the impugned judgment and order.

5. The Appeal is dismissed accordingly.

6. By order dated 09.05.2005 this Court has granted bail to the appellant. The bail bonds are cancelled. The appellant shall be taken into custody forthwith to serve out the remaining portion of sentence.

7. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant should be granted remission of the rest of her sentence. In our opinion, remission can only be granted by the executive authorities.

8. However, the appellant will be free to seek appropriate redress from the appropriate Government by making a repres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top