SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1368

B.N.AGARWAL, G.S.SINGHVI
BHARAT LAL PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
RAMJI PRASAD YADAV – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Uttar Pradesh Bar Council allowed the complaint filed by the respondent and suspended the licence of the appellant, who was practising as an advocate in the civil court at Deoria for a period of ten years. The said order has been confirmed in appeal filed by the All-India Bar Council. Hence, this appeal.

2. From a bare perusal of the impugned order, it would appear that the only allegation against the appellant was that he had filed a large number of cases on behalf of the wife of the respondent against the respondent. In our view, this allegation does not amount to any professional misconduct and the State Bar Council was not justified in suspending the licence of the appellant and the appellate authority has committed an error in confirming the same.

3. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, the impugned orders are set aside and the complaint filed by the respondent is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top