SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1466

B.S.CHAUHAN, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
SANJAY KUMAR KEDIA ALIAS SANJAY KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D. Lalit, Senior Advocate (Manoj Prasad, Advocate) for the Appellant;
Avijit Bhattacharjee and Bikas Kargupta, Advocates, for the Respondents.

ORDER

1. These appeals arise out of the following facts: the appellant was arrested on 12-2-2007 for the offences punishable under Sections 24, 29, 30 and 38 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called "the Act") and was produced before the Special Judge who remanded him to judicial custody for fifteen days, the period being extended from time to time.

2. The appellant also moved an application for bail before the Special Judge. This application was rejected on 28-5-2007 where after the appellant moved the Calcutta High Court. This application was rejected on 7-6-2007. The appellant, aggrieved by the order of 7-6-2007, preferred a special leave petition in this Court on 10-7-2007 which too was dismissed on 3-12-2007.

3. It appears that as the period of 180 days fixed under Section 36-A(4) of the Act read with Section 167(2) of the C
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top