SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1657

(2009) 17 Supreme Court Cases 789
D.K. JAIN AND R.M. LODHA, JJ.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA - Appellant
Versus
BINANI ZINC LIMITED - Respondent
Civil Appeals Nos. 7045-46 of 2002 with Nos. 178-79 of 2003
Decided on: October 20, 2009

Advocates Appeared:
Rupesh Kumar, Ms Sunita Rani Singh, B.K. Prasad and Ms Anil Katiyar, Advocates, for the Appellant;
A.K.J. Nambiar, R. Rai, N.M.N. Mishra, Vedanta Varma and Ms Ruby Singh Ahuja, Advocates, for the Respondent:

Headnote:Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 35-L - Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 57-F(2) - Appellate Tribunal relying on decision of larger Bench of Tribunal in Wyeth case, held assessee entitled to clear partially used aluminium cathodes under Rule 57-F(2) – Order in that case final - Revenue cannot be permitted to reopen the issue - No merit - Appeal dismissed.

       [Paras 3 and 4]

ORDER

1. These appeals under Section 35-L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are directed against the final order dated 30-5-2002 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore, Karnataka (for short "the Tribunal") in Appeals Nos. E/2364 and 2365 of 1998.

2. By the impugned order, relying on the decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in Wyeth Laboratories Ltd. v. CCE, the Tribunal has allowed the appeals preferred by the assessee. The Tribunal has held that the assessee was entitled to clear partially used aluminium cathodes under Rule 57-F(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

3. When the appeals came up for hearing on 9-9-2009, the learned Additional Solicitor General sought time to seek instructions with regard to the status of the decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in Wyeth Laboratoriesl inasmuch as whether the said decision had been challenged by the Revenue or not. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that as per his instructions no appeal was preferred against the said order. Thus, the decision of the larger Bench in Wyeth Laboratoriesl has attained finality.

4. In view of the statement and having regard to the fact that in the present cases the Tribunal has not gone into the factual aspect of the assessee's case and has merely relied upon the said decision, while granting relief to the assessee, the Revenue cannot be permitted to reopen the issue.

5. The appeals being devoid of any merit are dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top