JUDGMENT

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

M.P. THAKKAR, J.- The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (the Tribunal) by its judgment under appeal has taken the view that the respondents are entitled to claim the rights conferred by Section 32(1-B) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Tribunal has recorded the finding that on the "appointed day", that is to say, on 15-6-1955, the father of the respondents who was the tenant in respect of the lands in question at the material time was in possession of the lands but that he had been later on dispossessed otherwise than in accordance with law.

2. The contention raised by the appellants before the Tribunal that the tenant had surrendered the lands in accordance with law on 21-2-1955 and that he was not in possession of the lands in question on the appointed day (15-6-1955) was repelled by the Tribunal. This very contention has been reiterated before us on behalf of the appellants in this appeal. We agree WIth the reasoning and conclusion of the Tribunal that surrender could have been made lawfully only under Section 15 read with Section 29(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (the BTAL Act) as i