ORDER

IA No. 756

1. Despite the last two orders DDA has not filed response to this application. We grant last opportunity and direct DDA to tile its response within four weeks. List thereafter.

CP No. 193

2. To come up on 16-12-2002.

IA No. 773

3. From the submission made by the learned counsel, it appears that the order has been worked out, the IA is disposed of.

IA No. 774

4. Let copy of the application be sent to the Central Empowered Committee. List after receipt of response from the said Committee.

IA No. 775

5. On request of Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Additional Solicitor General the IA is adjourned for three weeks. List after reopening in the year 2003.

IA No. 421

6. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that pursuant to and in compliance with the order dated 1-5-2000 passed in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad (35) v. Union of India, a representation for reconsideration was filed with HPC. However, by an order dated 7-6-2001, that representation has not been considered for want of deposit of 50% of the penalty. The said order, inter alia, states that the unit should deposit 50% of the penalty within 60 days. Subsequent order for deposit of the 100% penalty was passed on 1