SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 1124

Y.K.SABHARWAL, H.K.SEMA
T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

Illegal mining in Aravallis

1. Mr Harish N. Salve, the learned Senior Counsel points out that there appears to be some typographical error in the record of proceedings dated 29-10-2002/30-10-2002 in para 47 of SCC while dealing with the illegal mining in the Aravalli Hills. The sentence where error seems to have erupted is "This ban is not limited only to the hills encircling Kote and Alampur Villages but extends to the entire hill range of Aravalli from Dholpur to Rajasthan." It appears that the word "Dholpur" should have been "Haryana". Now the word "Dholpur" would be read as "Haryana".

IAs Nos. 819-21 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

2. Let Power Grid Corporation, Respondent 6 respond to the point raised in the application by filing an affidavit within a period of four weeks. Let copy of the applications be sent to the Central Empowered Committee and the Committee may give a report after hearing the applicant and Power Grid Corporation. List after the report of the Central Empowered Committee is received.

IA No. 788 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

3. List after four weeks. Affidavit may be filed in the meantime by the Union of India.

Court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top