R.M.LODHA, AFTAB ALAM
Umerkhan – Appellant
Versus
Bismillabi @ Babulal Shaikh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.M. Lodha, J. —
Leave granted.
2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred by the original 1st defendant against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench whereby the learned Single Judge of that Court reversed the judgment and decree passed in the appeal by the Additional District Judge, Osmanabad and restored the judgment and decree of the trial court.
3. Sardar Khan was the owner of a property bearing land Block No. 386 and House No. 206 situate at Mangrul, Taluqa Kallam, District Osmanabad. He died in 1948 leaving behind a son —Umerkhan and two daughters—Bismillabi and Aminabi. Both daughters were minor at the time of the death of their father. They got married later. Bismillabi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘plaintiff’) filed a suit for partition and separate possession to the extent of 1/4th share in the above property against her brother Umerkhan (hereinafter referred to as, ‘1st defendant’) and her sister Aminabi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘2nd defendant’). The plaintiff’s case in the plaint was that as per the Muhammadan Law, the 1st defendant has 1/2 share while the 2nd defendant like her has 1/4th share in the suit pro
Ishwar Dass Jain (Dead) through LRs. v. Sohan Lal (Dead) by LRs., (2000) 1 SCC 434
Roop Singh (Dead) through L.Rs., v. Ram Singh (Dead) through L.Rs, (2000) 3 SCC 708
Chadat Singh v. Bahadur Ram and Ors, 2004) 6 SCC 359
C.A. Sulaiman and Ors. v. State Bank of Travancore, Alwayee and Ors., (2006) 6 SCC 392
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur v. Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors, 2010) 13 SCC 216
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.