SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 867

2011 (6) Supreme 638
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma and Anil R. Dave, JJ.
Sanjay Kumar Singh — Appellant (s)
versus
Union of India & Ors. — Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 4888 of 2005
with
Civil Appeal No. 4885 of 2005
with
Civil Appeal Nos. 4886-4887 of 2005
Decided on : 6-9-2011

IMPORTANT POINTS
1. Unless and until it is shown that prejudice has been caused it cannot be said that the inquiry proceeding is vitiated or that there is any violation of principles of natural justice.
2. The role of the Court in the matter of departmental proceedings is very limited and the Court cannot substitute its own views or findings by replacing the findings arrived at by the authority on detailed appreciation of the evidence on record.

Headnote:Service Law-Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955- Rules 26, 27(c) -Appellants members of CRPF were dismissed from services on being found guilty of charges that while they were deputed to function as escort party to the water tanker, they committed disobedience of orders, committed gross misconduct and displayed cowardice in execution of their duties and in their capacity as members of CRPF-Challenge thereagainst on plea that there was violation of principles of natural justice in the departmental proceedings as appellants were not given list of witnesses and that some witnesses were examined who were not even cited as witnesses in said list- Unless and until it is shown that prejudice has been caused it cannot be said that the inquiry proceeding is vitiated or that there is any violation of principles of natural justice-So far as the issue with regard to the reading out of charge-sheet was concerned, same could be read out only when trial begins in order to find out whether appellants plead guilty to the charges or not and immediately thereafter trial commences- No prejudice caused to appellants because one of witnesses was examined in the trial before expiry of forty eight hours, particularly in view of the fact that appellants were made aware of the contents of the charges much prior- No prejudice was caused to appellants for not giving 48 hours after reading out charges to them- Only one witness was examined within that 48 hours period whereas next two witnesses were examined beyond 48 hours period-Since a list of witnesses was also supplied to appellants along with charge-sheet issued to them, appellants were fully aware as to who were the persons who were going to be examined in the proceeding- Appeals having no merits dismissed. (Paras 18 to 23)

        Service Law-Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955- Rules 26, 27(c) -Appellants members of CRPF were dismissed from services on being found guilty of charges that while they were deputed to function as escort party to the water tanker, they committed disobedience of orders, committed gross misconduct and displayed cowardice in execution of their duties and in their capacity as members of CRPF-Challenge thereagainst- Role of the Court in matter of departmental proceedings is very limited and the Court cannot substitute its own views or findings by replacing the findings arrived at by the authority on detailed appreciation of the evidence on record-Instantly two Benches of High Court after looking into records had found that there was no violation of principles of natural justice and that charges had been established against all appellants and that punishment awarded was not disproportionate to offences alleged- After said findings had been recorded by Single Judge and Division Bench, there was hardly any scope for Apex Court to substitute its findings and come to a different conclusion, by re- appreciating the evidence- The findings recorded by Benches of High Court being concurrent findings same could not be interfered with lightly- Appeals dismissed. (Paras 24 to 27)

       

JUDGMENT

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —

1. By this common judgment and order we propose to dispose of all the four appeals which are interconnected as the issues and the facts arising for our consideration are similar. They were heard together and, therefore, a common judgment and order is also passed.

2. These appeals are filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 10.12.2003 passed by the Gauhati High Court whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ appeals of the appellants and thereby confirmed the judgment and order dated 16.8.02 passed by the learned single Judge dismissing all the writ petitions filed by the appellants holding that the appellants were given all reasonable opportunity to defend themselves and, therefore, there was no merit in those writ petitions.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that on 13th March, 1999 the appellants and few others of the Central Reserve Police Force [for short “CRPF”] while serving under 60 Battalion stationed at Haflong were detailed to go in two vehicles, one as escort and other a water tanker for bringing water from Retezole Jatinga water point. Sanjay Kumar Singh, the driver, Jai Shankar Sharma and K.N. Paswan were in the water tanker and they were provided with an escort vehicle which was driven by Jawahar Lal and the other occupants in the said escort vehicle were Head Constable Emmanuel Herenz; L. Nk. Harendra Chowdhury; L. Nk. Jaswant Singh; Constable U.K.S. Gurung and Constable P.S. Madhvi. While the water tanker with the escort party following was on its way to the said water point, the militants ambushed the vehicles and started firing indiscriminately as a result of which five CRPF personnel in the escort vehicle were killed, namely, Driver Jawahar Lal; L. Nk. Harendra Chowdhury; L. Nk. Jaswant Singh; Constable U.K.S. Gurung and Constable P.S. Madhvi. The appellants were the four who survived the ambush.

4. Head Constable Emmanuel Herenz is the only survivor of the escort vehicle who jumped out of the escort vehicle when the ambush took place leaving behind the wireless set given to him in the truck itself. It has also come on record that when the militants opened fire L. Nk. Jai Shankar Sharma sitting in the water tanker thought that there was a tyre burst. In order to look at it he got out of the water tanker when he came to realize that it is actually an attack by the militants. In the meantime, the driver Sanjay Kumar Singh stopped for a while and thereafter drove away the tanker but L. Nk. Jai Shankar Sharma could not despite his best efforts re-board the vehicle. It has also come in evidence that the driver of the tanker took the vehicle to the Haringajab Police Station, which was 15 kilometers away from the scene of occurrence, and from there he had allegedly informed his Unit about the incident.

5. When search parties reached the spot they found Head Constable Emmanuel Herenz hiding whereas L/Nk Jai Shankar Sharma who had also got down and had run away from the place of occurrence was found out from his hiding place which was under a gorge. On the same day the Deputy Commandant, 60 Battalion lodged a First Information Report with the officer-in-charge, Haflong Police Station and on 16.03.1999 all the appellants were suspended from service pending departmental proceedings against them. The appellants were thereafter issued a chargesheet with the allegations that while the appellants were deputed to function as escort party to the water tanker, they committed disobedience of orders, committed gross misconduct and displayed cowardice in execution of their duties and in their capacity as members of CRPF. The two articles of charges framed against them read as follows: -

“Article-I:-

“.... Out of the two vehicles (Regn. No. DIG 3390 water truck (3/5 ton) and Regn. No. DL-IG 7976 escort vehicle) deputed with escort party was attacked by the militants by laying ambush. The above personnel ins

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top