R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.K.PATNAIK
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Luxmi Kant Shukla – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. K. Patnaik, J.
Leave granted.
2. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 16.09.2010 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 05 (S/B) of 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the impugned judgment’).
3. The facts very briefly are that the respondent is a member of the Provincial Civil Services of the State of U.P. When he was posted as Special Secretary, Samaj Kalyan Department, Government of U.P. in 2006, he authored a book titled ‘Jati Raj’. As the book contained some remarks against national leaders like late Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the State Government issued a letter dated 11.09.2007 to the respondent when he was posted as Special Secretary, Dharmarth Karya Department, Government of U.P., requesting him to furnish to the Government a copy of the book. The respondent instead of furnishing a copy of the book proceeded on leave and on 12.02.2008 he was placed under suspension in contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings. On 19.02.2008, a charge-sheet containing 16 charges was served on him. The charges against the respondent were that certain passages in the book ‘Jati Raj’ written by him were
Bishan Lal v. State of Haryana (AIR 1977 P&H 7)
Union of India and Others v. Sayed Muzaffar Mir [1995 Supp (1) SCC 76]
State of Haryana v. S.K.Singhal [(1999) 4 SCC 293]
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(1974) 2 SCC 831]
Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana v. Inderjit Singh and Another [(2008) 13 SCC 506]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.