IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Mishra, JJ.
Gopal Dass thru. Brother Anand Vir
Versus.
Union of India (UOI) and Anr.
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 16 of 2008
Decided On: 14.03.2011
JUDGMENT
Markandey Katju, J.
Qafas udaas hai yaaron sabaa se kuch to
kaho Kaheen to beher-e-khuda aaj zikr-e-yaar chale
FAIZ AHMED FAIZ
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a direction to the Respondent, Union of India, to take immediate and necessary steps for release and repatriation of the Petitioner, who is allegedly detained in the Lahore Central Jail in Pakistan, through the diplomatic channel of the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. It is alleged by the Petitioner that he is an Indian national. He was intercepted and arrested by the Pakistan Border Security Force in July 1984 when he alleged to have mistakenly crossed over the Indo-Pakistan border into Pakistan.
3. The Petitioner was tried by a Field General Court Martial at Sialkot Cantonment in Pakistan and was awarded life sentence on 27.12.1986 under Section 59/3 of the Pakistan Official Secrets Act, 1923. The said sentence was confirmed by Brigadier Mallik, Commander, 10th Brigade. He was lodged in different jails, and presently is allegedly in Mianwali Jail in Pakistan.
4. It is alleged that due to the Petitioner's detention his whole family is suffering from the year 1986. His brother, through whom this petition has been filed, made several representations to the concerned authorities of the Government of India requesting them to take up the matter with the Pakistan authorities for taking necessary action for release of the Petitioner and repatriation on humanitarian grounds, but as yet nothing has been done. It is further alleged that about 182 Indian prisoners have been languishing in Pakistan jails for many years. The Petitioner has written several letters to his family members, copies of which have been annexed to this petition.
5. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India dated January 2011. It has been stated therein that although the Petitioner is an Indian citizen, he has been convicted by a Pakistani Court, and hence his detention is governed by the law in force in Pakistan. The Government of India has an agreement with Pakistan on Consular Access, and has been continually pursuing the issue of release of Indian prisoners in Pakistani jails. On a request made by the Government of India a list of prisoners in Pakistani jails was received from Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs in January 2010, which authenticates that the Petitioner was awarded sentence of 25 years from 27.6.1986. On instructions from the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, the Indian High Commission in Pakistan has requested the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Pakistan to urgently clarify whether the Court order sentencing the Petitioner required pre-trial detention to be adjusted in the sentence. The Indian High Commission is still waiting for a response.
6. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the Government of India has been consistently taking up the issue of Indian prisoners in Pakistani jails with the Pakistan authorities at all levels. An 'India-Pakistan Judicial Committee on Prisoners', consisting of retired Judges, four from each country, has been set up to recommend steps to ensure humane treatment and expeditious release of prisoners of the respective countries in each other's jails. The Petitioner was produced before this Committee during their visit to Pakistani jails in June 2008. The Committee has held several meetings and made certain recommendations, and the response is awaited. It is alleged that there is no confirmation from the Government of Pakistan about completion of his sentence by the Petitioner.
7. We have heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Solicitor General of India for the Union of India.
8. We cannot give any directions to Pakistan authorities because we have no jurisdiction over them. The Indian authorities have done all that they could in the matter.
9. However, that does not preve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.