GYAN SUDHA MISRA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Atma Ram Builders P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Tuli – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Special Leave Petitions were filed in this Court against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 14th September, 2010 by which the Delhi High Court had rejected the second appeal filed by the tenant against the decree of eviction.
3. By our order dated 06th October, 2010, we dismissed the special leave petitions by the following order:
Taken on Board.
Heard.
We find no merit in the special leave petitions and they are dismissed accordingly. However, we grant six months' time from today to the Petitioner to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from today.
4. From a perusal of the above order, it is evident that the tenant had to vacate the premises in question within six months' from the date of dismissal of the special leave petitions and to furnish usual undertaking within six weeks from that date. It is extremely unfortunate that neither an undertaking was furnished nor did the tenant vacate the premises in question on the expiry of six months, i.e., 06th April, 2011. Instead, frivolous objections were filed in the execution proceedings, and our order was flouted. Hence, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.