SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 508

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Atma Ram Builders P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Tuli – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Special Leave Petitions were filed in this Court against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 14th September, 2010 by which the Delhi High Court had rejected the second appeal filed by the tenant against the decree of eviction.

3. By our order dated 06th October, 2010, we dismissed the special leave petitions by the following order:

Taken on Board.

Heard.

We find no merit in the special leave petitions and they are dismissed accordingly. However, we grant six months' time from today to the Petitioner to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from today.

4. From a perusal of the above order, it is evident that the tenant had to vacate the premises in question within six months' from the date of dismissal of the special leave petitions and to furnish usual undertaking within six weeks from that date. It is extremely unfortunate that neither an undertaking was furnished nor did the tenant vacate the premises in question on the expiry of six months, i.e., 06th April, 2011. Instead, frivolous objections were filed in the execution proceedings, and our order was flouted. Hence, t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top