2011 Supreme(SC) 756
DEEPAK VERMA, B.S.CHAUHAN, J.M.PANCHAL
Siddhu Matriculation Hr. Secondary School – Appellant
Versus
K. Shyam Sunder – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A. Navaneetha Krishna, AG, TN, Guru Krishna Kumar, A. Sethuraman, AAG, TN, P.P. Rao, C.A. Sundaram, Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Advs., Subramonium Prasad, Anesh Paul, Apeksha Saran, Sweta Mohta, Akshat Hansaria, Utsav Sidhu, V.P. Sengottuvel, S. Ravi Shankar, Rohini Musa, Yogesh Kotemmath, Zafar Inayat, G. Umapathy, Sudha Umapathy, P.V. Yogeswaran, Debmalya banerjee and Manik Karanjawala, Advs. For karanjawala and Co.
For Respondents/Defendant: T.R. Andhyarujina, M.N, Krishnamani, R. Viduthalai, Dhruv Mehta, Basava Prabhu S. Patil, A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam, Sr. Advs., T. Harish Kumar, S. Beno Benciger, Sameer, Sri Ram Krishna, B. Vinod Khanna, S. Prabhu Rama Subramanian, Sabarish Subramanian, Suresh Sakthi Murugan, S.J. Aristole, Ankolekar Gurudatta, S. Ashok Kumar, Gouri Karuna Das Mohanti, Anu Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, G. Sivabalamurugan, Anis Mohd., L.K. Pandey, Prakhar Sharma, S. Nanda Kumar, Satish Kumar, Anjali Chauhan, Parivesh Kumar Singh, R. Satish Kumar, V.N. Raghupathy, Prashant Bhushan, P.B. Suresh Babu, S. Gowthaman, S.R. Setia, M. Yogesh Kanna and Himmat Singh Shergill, Advs.
ORDER
1. All the Civil appeals are disposed of in terms of our judgment delivered today in Civil Appeal Nos. 6015-6027 of 2011 (State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. K. Shyam Sunder and Ors.). All other applications, if any, filed in these appeals/connected matters also stand disposed of.
2. We do not think it appropriate to entertain the contempt petitions. Thus, the same stand dismissed.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document