SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 216

G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Amiya Bala Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Mukud Adhikari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S.K. Bhattacharya, Adv.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 14.7.1998 of the learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court whereby he dismissed the second appeal filed by the Appellants against the judgment and decree passed by the Assistant District Judge, Barpeta (hereinafter referred to as "the lower appellate Court") in a suit filed by Balindra Narayan Adhikari (predecessor of the Respondents) for declaration and recovery of possession of the suit property i.e., land measuring OB-2K-10L situated at Sorbhog town under Domoka Saka Bousi Mouza.

2. The suit was dismissed by learned Munsif, Barpeta (hereinafter described as "the trial Court") on the ground that the Plaintiff had not produced any document to prove his title and the entries made in revenue records were not sufficient for declaring him as owner of the suit property.

3. During the pendency of the appeal, the Plaintiff and the Defendant died and their legal representatives were brought on record. After analysing the pleadings and the documents produced by the parties, the lower appellate Court held that the Plaintiff-Respondents have been able to prove their title. The lower appellate Court noted that as per the certified c









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top