SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 864

A.K.PATNAIK, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
J. D. Suryavanshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant: Indira Jaisingh, ASG, Abhinav Mukerji & Samridhi
Sinha Advocates.

Judgment :-

(PER R.V. RAVEENDRAN, J.)

1. Leave granted.

2. The respondent, a practicing lawyer, file a public interest litigation in the year 2009 in the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Gwalior Bench) praying for issue of the following directions to the Railway administration (Western Railway, West Central Railway and North Central Railway):

(i) the additional berths from Three Tier Sleeper & AC Class Coaches in all trains;

(ii) to complete the second track between Gwalior and Indore; and submit a progress report to court in respect of the work done in the last 25 years.

(iii) to reschedule the train timings of Bhind-Indore Intercity Express (Train No.9319/9320) and Gwalior-Indore Express (Train No.1125/1126 taking into account various factors and not to stop the train at Parihar and Laxmibai Nagar;

(iv) to fill all vacant posts of coolies in all stations to avoid discomfort to passengers;

(v) to introduce addition 3 tier sleeper coaches in all trains between Gwalior and Indore.

(vi) to introduce additional coaches (AC-I & AC-III) in Dehradun Express, additional coaches (AC-I and AC-II tier) in Bhind-Indore Intercity Express and Gwalior-Indore Expresses (Train No.9318, 9320, 1125 & 1126)






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top