SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1156

A.K.PATNAIK, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, P.SATHASIVAM
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SAKAMMA – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. Heard.

2. 221 acres 20 guntas of land in Keragalli village, Mysore Taluk, including three acres of land belonging to the respondent in each of these two appeals were acquired for the Mysore Urban Development Authority for formation of layout under preliminary notification dated 15.7.1997 (Gazetted on 24.7.1997) and final notification dated 29.3.2001, issued under Sec.17 (1) and 19(1) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987. After making the award, possession was taken on 16.8.2003 and 27.11.2003 respectively.

3. The Land Acquisition Officer, by his Award dated 4.2.2003, determined the compensation as Rs.1,55,000/- per acre. On reference, the reference Court, by judgment and award dated 17.4.2008, increased the compensation to Rs.13,49,000/- per acre. It also awarded 30% solatium, 12% additional amount from the date of preliminary notification to date of award and interest at the rate of 9% per annum for one year from the date of preliminary notification and thereafter at the rate of 15% per annum.

4. Feeling aggrieved, the appellants filed appeals before the High Court. The High Court, by the impugned judgment dated 21.10.2008, confirmed the award o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top