SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1048

H.L.DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in S.B.Criminal Misc.Petition No.931 of 2009 dated 6.8.2010. The respondent herein had filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Code') for quashing of F.I.R.No.110 of 2004, registered for the alleged offences under Sections 7,8, 10, 13(1)(a) & 13(1) (d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 466, 471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code by the Special Police Station, Rajasthan State Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur. The High Court, while disposing of the aforesaid petition, has passed the following order :

"In view of above order passed, it appears that in two identical matters, protection has been provided to the petitioner therefore, to maintain parity, I deem it proper to pass order that no adverse or punitive action be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of FIR No.110/2004 till the instant petition is decided."

The State is aggrieved by the later portion of the order passed by the High Court. That is how it is before us in this appeal. We have heard Dr.Manish Singhvi, lea


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top