SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 48

S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
LOVELY EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V. Shekhar, Senior Advocate (Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates) for the Petitioner.

ORDER

1. Delay condoned. Can the amount of share• application money be regarded as undisclosed income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? We find no merit in this special leave petition for the simple reason that if the share application money is received by the assessee Company from alleged bogus shareholders, whose names are given to the AO, then the Department is free to proceed to reopen their individual assessments in accordance with law. Hence, we find no infirmity with the impugned judgment.

2. Subject to the above, the special leave petition is dismissed.

Court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top