SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 452

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. M. PANCHAL
PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL ZOO AUTHORITY – Respondent


ORDER

IA No.3

1. This interlocutory application has been filed to finalise the guidelines prepared by the Central Zoo Authority for revival/rehabilitation of the animals in derecognised zoos in the country.

2. The Member-Secretary of the Central Zoo Authority has filed an affidavit along with Annexure P-1 wherein it is stated that in total 509 applications were received in the Central Zoo Authority from different zoos, rescue centres and circuses. All the applications were considered by the Central Zoo Authority and in total 180 wild animals have been given recognition as "zoo" under Section 38-H of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and 38 wild animals were found not requiring recognition by the Central Zoo Authority. It is also stated by the Central Zoo Authority that further action would be taken in the matter.

3. The Central Zoo Authority may continue to implement the policy. IA No.3 is adjourned for further directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top