SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.M. PANCHAL & H.L. GOKHALE, JJ.
JAMALUDDIN Appellants
VERSUS
STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND ORS. Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 8093 of 2004-
Decided on 29-09-2011.
Service Law – Reservation – Relaxation in age for SC/ST candidates – Anomaly – No relaxation provided for Munsifs although available to Higher Judicial Service – Rules made by High Court – Article 234, Constitution of India and Section 110, Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir – Have force of law and will govern recruitment to judicial services. (Para 13)
AIR 2000 SC 1296 – Relied upon
Administrative Law – Reservation for SC/ST – Relaxation in age for recruitment – Rules providing quota for SC/ST, but not relaxation in age – Resolution of Full Court of the High Court cannot be read into the Rules – If there is no age relaxation in the rules, the same cannot be brought in by any judicial interpretation. (Para 15)
JKJ (HC) (Suppl.) 2009 600; 2010 (1) SLJ 281; (1985) 3 SCC 721 – Referred
Facts of the case:
The appellant belongs to a Scheduled Tribe. Born on 31.1.1965, he was appointed as an adhoc Munsif in the Jammu & Kashmir Judicial Service on 13.8.2001. Subsequently, he applied for the post of Munsif in the Scheduled Tribe category for regular appointment. The notification required the person to be of not more than thirty five years of age as on the 1st January of the year in which the notification was issued. The Commission held him to be overage by eleven months.
His writ petition was dismissed by the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
There is no infirmity in the impugned judgment.
Result:
Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
H.L. Gokhale J.-This appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dated 24.2.2004 in LPA No. 133/2003, confirming the order dated 8.9.2003 passed by a learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition No. SWP 994/2002 filed by the appellant. Facts leading to this appeal are this wise
2. The appellant belongs to a Scheduled Tribe. He is born on 31.1.1965. He was appointed as an adhoc Munsif in the Jammu & Kashmir Judicial Service on 13.8.2001. Subsequently, he applied for the post of Munsif in the Scheduled Tribe category when a notification was issued by the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission on 4.12.2001 for the regular appointments. The notification required the person to be of not more than thirty five years of age as on the 1st January of the year in which the notification was issued. In view thereof, the Commission informed him by communication dated 21.5.2002 that his application was rejected since he was overage by eleven months.
3. Being aggrieved by that order the appellant filed the above referred Writ Petition. A Single Judge who heard the matter, noted that as per rule 7 of Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Judicial) Recruitment Rules 1967 (Judicial Services Recruitment Rules for short), the appellant was in fact overage. This rule reads as follows:-
"7. Age. No person shall be recruited to the service who is more than 35 years of age on the first day of January preceding the year examination is conducted by the Commission for Recruitment to the Service."
While dismissing the petition, the Single Judge noted that by the time that matter was heard, the appellant had crossed the age of 37 years which he claimed as the permissible age for the Scheduled Tribe candidates. The Division Bench which heard the Letters Patent Appeal also accepted the view taken by the learned Single Judge, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
4. Shri Ambrish Kumar, learned counsel appeared for the appellant, and Shri Gaurav Pachnanda, learned Senior Additional Advocate General of Jammu and Kashmir appeared for the respondents. The State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Public Service Commission of Jammu and Kashmir and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir through its Registrar General are joined as the respondents to this appeal.
5. It is pointed out on behalf of the appellant that earlier there was no appropriate reservation for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the services of State of Jammu and Kashmir, and also in the services of the High Court. Hence, the then Minister of Law and Justice, Union of India wrote to the Chief Justice of the High Court on 15.5.1979 drawing his attention to this position. The Union Law Minister stated in his letter as follows:-
"1....
2. From the information received from the Jammu and Kashmir High Court last year, it transpires that there is no provision for reservation for Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes in direct recruitment to the State Judicial and Higher Judicial Services.
3. ..... You will appreciate that in their present stage of development, it would be difficult for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to be represented adequately in the State Judicial and Higher Judicial Services unless special measures like reservation are undertaken. Since such reservation exists in other services, there does not seem to be sufficient reason why it should not be there in the State Judicial and Higher Judicial Services of the State........"
6. In view of this letter from the Union Law Minister, this subject was taken up in the Full Court Meeting of the High Court held from 23 rd February to 26th February, 1982, wherein following decision was taken:-
PREAMBLE RESOLVED
14. Reservation of Seats for Schedule 14. Considered the report of Registrar castes and Scheduled Tribes in the and also the relevant record. We are of Judicial Service and Minister Services. the opinion that the general rules framed by the Government of J&K in this b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.