SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 712

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD
Ravikant Bansal
Versus
M.P. Rural Road Development Authy & Another
Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18867 of 2011
Decided on:29-07-2011

Headnote

Administration of Justice – Arbitration matter – Arbitration clause itself mentioning that arbitration will be by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal – Hence, arbitration has to be done by the Tribunal. (Para 3)

       Civil Appeal No.3746 of 2005 – Distinguished.

Judgment :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This Petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 11th March, 2011 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior Bench in Arbitration Case No.4 of 2010.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on a decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No.3746 of 2005 decided on 14th January, 2010.

We are of the opinion that the aforesaid decision is distinguishable because in the present case the arbitration clause itself mentions that the arbitration will be by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal. Hence, in this case arbitration has to be done by the Tribunal.

The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top