G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Premji Nathu – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J. — Whether the application submitted by the appellant under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act) was barred by time and Civil Judge (Senior Division), Junagadh (hereinafter described as the Reference Court) rightly refused to entertain his prayer for enhancement of the compensation determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer is the question which arises for consideration in this appeal filed against judgment dated 16.8.2011 of the learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court.
2. The appellants land was acquired by the State Government along with other parcels of land for implementation of Mendarda Amrapur Road Scheme. Notification under Section 4(1) was issued on 4.3.1982 and the declaration under Section 6(1) was published on 7.10.1982. The Special Land Acquisition Officer determined the amount of compensation at the rate of Rs.110/- per Are for irrigated land and Rs.80/- per Are for non-irrigated land.
3. After passing of the award, the Collector issued notice to the appellant under Section 12(2), which was received by him on 22.2.1985. Similar notices were received by the other landowners on 22.2.1985 and 23.2
Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Land Acquisition Officer, AIR 1961 SC 1500
State of Punjab v. Qaisar Jehan Begum, AIR 1963 SC 1604
Bhagwan Das v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2010) 3 SCC 545
B. N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore (1966) 3 SCR 682
Bhupinderpal Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others (2000) 5 SCC 262
Nilabati Behera (Smt) Alias Lalita v. State of Orissa and others (1993) 2 SCC 746
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.