SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 138

2012 (3) Supreme 272
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.L. Dattu and Anil R. Dave, JJ.
Baldhari Singh & Ors. — Appellants
versus
State of U.P. & Ors. — Respondents
Civil Appeal No.6493 of 2003
Decided on : 14-2-2012

Headnote:Adjournment of Matter-Submission of counsel for the appellant that the requirements of the supply of the Civil Appeal paper books was not necessary, since she was not interested in prosecuting the appeal-Matter not adjourned since it was of the year 2003-Taking the statement made by counsel for appellant as the gospel truth, appeal disposed off as not pressed. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Mr.T.N.Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.Kamlendra Mishra, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, submits that learned counsel for the appellant Smt.Rani Chhabra had informed the Standing Counsel of the State of Uttar Pradesh that the requirements of the supply of the Civil Appeal paper books may not be necessary, since she is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Learned counsel Smt.Rani Chhabra is not present before the Court when the matter is called for hearing. Since the matter is of the year 2003, we do not intend to adjourn the matter. Therefore, taking the statement made by learned counsel appearing for Mr.Kamlendra Mishra as the gospel truth, we dispose of this appeal as not pressed.

Ordered accordingly.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top