ALTAMAS KABIR, S.S.NIJJAR, J.CHELAMESWAR
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Altamas Kabir, J.-Leave granted.
2. The sole question for consideration in these appeals is whether on a complaint made to the Copyright Board under Section 31 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the said Board under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) can pass an interim order in the pending complaint. Since, we shall be dealing with the said section throughout this judgment, the same is extracted hereinbelow :
“31. Compulsory licence in works withheld from public.-
(1) If at any time during the term of copyright in any Indian work which has been published or performed in public, a complaint is made to the Copyright Board that the owner of copyright in the work-
(a) has refused to republish or allow the re-publication of the work or has refused to allow the performance in public of the work, and by reason of such refusal the work is withheld from the public; or
(b) has refused to allow communication to the public by [broadcast], of such work or in the case of a [sound recording] the work recorded in such [sound recording], on terms which the complainant considers reasonable, the Copyright Board, after giving to the owner of the copyright in the work a reasonable opportunity of being
Income Tax Officer Vs. M.K. Mohammed Kunhi [(1969) 2 SCR 65
Allahabad Bank, Calcutta Vs. Radha Krishna Maity & Ors. [(1999) 6 SCC 755]
Entertainment Network (India) Limited Vs. Super Cassette Industries Limited [(2008) 13 SCC 30]
Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Ors. Vs. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Anr. [2011 (9) SCALE 287]
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Kartick Das [(1994) 4 SCC 225]
Sham Lal Vs. State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.